On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Rather than build everything twice, I decided to wait for the new kdelibs
> tarball. Once that's up, I'll rebuild everything against that and report
> back if I see issues or not.
Hi,
thanks for the patience, here is the new tarball:
d8262
On Monday 28 May 2012, Allen Winter wrote:
> Is anyone strongly in favor of KDE SC 4.8.5?
Hi,
not necessarily in favor, but in case there are urgent issues we might be
reconsidering it.
IMHO we should revisit the topic in 2 months and then decide if it is worth
it.
With other words, we ke
Hi,
As I was late with providing the tarballs, let's delay release until Thursday
to have more time for testing and preparation. Also my internet connection does
not allow openvpn ATM. ;-(
Cya,
Dirk___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
ht
Allen Winter schrieb:
>> If that is correct what is the process of generating the tarballs?
>The readme file seems to deal only with the svn era setup.
>Right, thus we need Dirk.
>
The scripts are still used equivalently. I'll update the README to be more
precise soon.
Greetings,
Dirk
___
Hi,
I apologize, I did not start tagging on Thursday like planned, due to various
urgent work and private matters.
I currently have only limited internet access. I'll be able to finish the
tarballs on Monday.
Sorry,
Dirk___
release-team mailing li
On Saturday 31 March 2012, Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > Also, please mail release-team@kde.org about any issues you find as
> > blocking for this release. the plan is to release them tuesday or
> > wednesday next week.
> If also l10n packs are ready, could you check if kde-l10n-sr is around 12
> Mi
On Wednesday 22 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > kde-l10n is currently taken from trunk/l10n-kde4 and will be switching
> > over to ??? in the future / until KDE 4.7.0 release.
> Will be switching to branches/stable/l10n-kde4 as always, why should we
> change?
I don't know, it seems the hy
Hi,
I just finished uploading the first set of Beta2 tarballs, a bit later than
expected, sorry about that.
I'll start testing them now, please report any issues you might find.
Thanks,
Dirk
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https
Hi,
We have a KDE 4.3 Beta2 tagging milestone tonight at 23:59 UTC. I will,
assuming that trunk compiles, perform tagging tomorrow morning (12 hours from
now).
If there are urgent outstanding issues not ready until then, please tell
release-t...@kde.org.
Thanks,
Dirk
__
Hi,
just finished uploading the first try of KDE 4.2.4 packages. not yet tested in
any way.. Please let me know of any issues.
Thanks,
Dirk
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> I have made two commits that need to be included in the 4.2.1
> packages: r933172 and r934456.
>
> Hopefully this won't cause too much trouble. Now I need to work out
> why it was so unstable even if 4.2.0 worked fine with the same code.
I've updated kdebase-workspace to include those fixes:
Am Montag 29 September 2008 17:26:48 schrieb John Tapsell:
> Do we have any script to check for ABI/API breakages? This should be
> a fairly simple nm-type script no?
The so version bump was actually done on purpose, and I noticed it while
checking the tarballs, but I didn't complain.
Greetin
Hi,
I've finished tagging KDE 4.1 Beta1 (it is mostly r810705) and generating
tarballs except for l10n, which is still running.
Note that this release again removes kdevplatform and kdewebdev/quanta. There
is no replacement. Currently there is also not a kdeplasmoids module even
though that
13 matches
Mail list logo
