-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-09-2012 21:23, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 16:07:30 Allen Winter wrote:
>> Hot fixes should be sent to kde-packagers as a patch, or even
>> better as a commit number.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> "Dear packagers, we found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-07-2012 14:06, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 15-07-2012 11:57, Michael Jansen wrote:
>
> I provided specific numbers before to make sure we were all
> talking about the same - from the above I see we are not.
>
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-07-2012 11:57, Michael Jansen wrote:
> On Sunday, July 15, 2012 01:00:28 AM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>> Am Samstag 14 Juli 2012, 23:47:29 schrieb David Faure:
>>> On Saturday 14 July 2012 12:29:57 Michael Jansen wrote:
Why not marking an alpha,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-07-2012 10:29, Michael Jansen wrote:
> On Friday, July 13, 2012 02:31:35 PM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
>>> So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached
>>> picture is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-07-2012 01:56, Michael Pyne wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 08, 2012 02:30:13 Michael Jansen wrote:
>>> Gentoo already supports betas, RCs, etc. in Portage though they
>>> have a different nomenclature (e.g. I think 4.7.0~beta1 would
>>> be 4.7.0_beta1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-07-2012 17:44, Michael Jansen wrote:
>
>>>
>>> If you have a problem with us setting up weekly snapshots in
>>> that format, then you may have a point because i am thinking
>>> about that use case. Afaik some distros provide weekly
>>> snapshot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2012 19:30, Michael Jansen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I started to work on some script to help with our release creation
> and studied both dirks and allens scripts for input. But the recent
> discussion and my personal experience in doing releases (wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-06-2012 19:35, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012, 20:17:56 schrieb Wulf C. Krueger:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10.06.2012 15:27, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
- - Before announcing the tar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-06-2012 18:49, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
>
> Let's put this thread to rest, though. I think we can both safely
> agree we have *completely* and seemingly irreconcilable points of
> view about QA and upstream/downstream roles.
>
> Since I seem to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22-07-2011 15:32, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.7.0 tarballs. Those
> are the split tarballs that I mentioned before, I have not succeeded
> yet in creating merged tarballs again.
>
> kde-l10n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-06-2011 17:44, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Thursday 23 June 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
>> just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.7 RC1 (4.6.90) tarballs, not
>> well tested yet so far.
>
> Hi,
>
> ok, so that was completely bogus. I'm s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-06-2011 13:17, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Fwiw, in fedora, we hacked the 4.6.80 kde.org tarballs and build-process
>> to be as-close-to-monolithic as possible.
>
> and do you continue to do that or wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-06-2011 21:09, Eric Hameleers wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>> Dear KDE upstream,
Are you serious that you want to decouple the release of our
frameworks from
each other? THat would create a huge mess,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-06-2011 14:19, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> Dirk, all,
>
> As you may or may not know kdeaccessibility and kdeutils are ready to
> migrate to git (when the freeze is over, don't worry). And we'd like to
> know what the feeling is about the best time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-05-2011 08:56, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 26-05-2011 02:02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> Hi again Dirk.
>
>> On 25-05-2011 09:23, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 24 May 2011, Jorge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-05-2011 02:02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi again Dirk.
>
> On 25-05-2011 09:23, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 May 2011, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
>>> I'm sending this email again a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again Dirk.
On 25-05-2011 09:23, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2011, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
>> I'm sending this email again as I didn't hear back from anyone and the
>> tarballs were published
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-05-2011 18:42, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 21 May 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote:
>>
>>> The turn of events with KDE 4.7.x is most unfortunate. I noticed
On Sat, 21 May 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Saturday 21 May 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote:
>
>> The turn of events with KDE 4.7.x is most unfortunate. I noticed an
>> explosion of source tarballs.
>
> Yes, I started to resemble the git layout in the tarballs, given that I had a
> pain in the ass of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-05-2011 01:01, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Allen Winter writes:
>
>> On Friday 06 May 2011 7:28:50 PM Manuel Tortosa wrote:
>>> Just this, the language tarballs have kdepim-runtime translations, this
>>> will
>>> collide with kdepim 4.6 be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
On 11-05-2011 22:39, Mathias Kraus wrote:
> Hello together,
>
> as some of you might know that Phonon is not really good for games because of
> the high latency and some other issues.
> Granatier used therefore for some time OpenAL and SndFile,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
On 06-05-2011 23:28, Manuel Tortosa wrote:
> Just this, the language tarballs have kdepim-runtime translations, this will
> collide with kdepim 4.6 beta tarballs.
Can we please have updated language tarballs to fix this issue? We
already have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-05-2011 21:56, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> I got all the 4.6 branches to build as a whole kdeedu module using the
> attached CMakeLists.txt. I only changed the CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE and such
> in those that wouldn't build, but maybe we sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-10-2010 14:57, Gökçen Eraslan wrote:
> 02 Ekim 2010 Cumartesi günü (saat 17:14:16) Rex Dieter şunları yazmıştı:
>> Using the latest sip-4.11.1 , PyQt4-4.7.7 here. A problem with PyQt4's
>> qglobal.sip ?
>
> Can you try this patch? Current PyQt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-09-2010 23:48, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dimarts, 7 de setembre de 2010, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto va escriure:
>> On 06-09-2010 17:43, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>>> A Diumenge, 5 de setembre de 2010, Dima Panov va escriur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-09-2010 17:43, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Diumenge, 5 de setembre de 2010, Dima Panov va escriure:
>> BTW, folks, I have a question about l10n packages for kdepim.
>> Since kde sc 4.5 ships without kdepim, separation of l10n packs for kdepim
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-04-2010 20:39, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010 07:24:19 pm Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> A Divendres, 2 d'abril de 2010, Jaroslav Reznik va escriure:
>>> On Monday 29 March 2010 09:43:20 pm Albert Astals Cid wrote:
You might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-12-2009 11:45, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2009-12-30, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> On 29-12-2009 23:09, Mike Arthur wrote:
>>> On 29 Dec 2009, at 23:43, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
>>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-12-2009 11:59, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 13:42:11 Dror Levin wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:31, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>> I'm starting to get really amazed how people are willing to condemn the
>> use of da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-12-2009 23:09, Mike Arthur wrote:
>
> On 29 Dec 2009, at 23:43, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
>> If "common sense" won't cut it, do I need to start a vote, forum thread
>> or something else asking KDE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-12-2009 18:30, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tuesday 29 December 2009 19:13:08 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> On Tuesday 29 of December 2009 13:50:12 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>>> On Sunday 27 December 2009 14:34:23 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 27 December 2009 13:06:18 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Sunday 27 December 2009 8:34:23 am Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> Actually one of those people screaming would be me :)
>> From my perspective it's much more convenient to have Nepomuk libs
(and
reach beta status?
On 13-02-2009 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Starting with KDE-4.2.61, unstable KDE snapshots started to include in
> the tarball name the svn revision number
> (${modulename}-${version}.svn${revision}.tar.bz2). Thus, instead of
> kdebase-runtime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
Starting with KDE-4.2.61, unstable KDE snapshots started to include in
the tarball name the svn revision number
(${modulename}-${version}.svn${revision}.tar.bz2). Thus, instead of
kdebase-runtime-4.2.63.tar.bz2, we now have
kdebase-runtime-4.2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 26 September 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > 1) Branch is feature frozen, the changes should be reverted, but are
> > > welcome for kde 4.2 series.
>
> the problem is now resolved; the changes were reverted. the lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks.
After talking on #kde-devel and #phonon today asking whether there was a
release or at least a snapshot for phonon, Thiago Macieira (thiago) told
me to mail you.
Can we please have a release for phonon or at least a snapshot?
- --
Regards,
36 matches
Mail list logo
