I´m following the disscution from afar (Chile right now..), I havn´t commited any code for quite sometime and when I´ll come back I´ll probably concentrate on bug fixes - but I feel that the general mood is to accept the offer.
I don´t feel that I should cast a vote on this matter due to the reasons above - but why don´t the krew vote on this issue ? If most people are comfartable with the idea - we can talk about details like saving history and the right point in time to do it later, if the krew rather contiue with the current SVN - than the details are irrelevent :) Keep up the great work (both on KDE and Krusader), Rafi. On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 25 November 2008 23:31:23 Jonas Bähr wrote: > > Since 2.0.0 would be our first KDE-4 release, it would be an > > acceptable point to beginn with a blank history. Sebastian, you > > mentioned "possibly losing history" as a disadvantage. Does this mean > > there is a chance to keep our history? Under which conditions? My svn > > knowledge regarding such migrations is limited, but I could only think > > of a replay of our repository. This does not really make sense.... > > As David said (and which might not have made it to the krusader list), it > *might* be possible to import history using svk. But you need to talk to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] about that. So I cannot be conclusive here. > > > > i think it has other advantages not mentioned here (mostly from PR > > > perspective), but that aside, i would like to know which module > > > krusader would be getting into. ideally, i'd like to see krusader in > > > a package that usually gets installed by default, which (i *think*) > > > is not the situation with extragear? > > > > I think extragear would be perfectly fine, at least for the beginning. > > Some of the most popular KDE apps, like Amarok, live in extragear. > > Plus, there we have the maximum of freedom. We can't claim our > > independence on the one hand and ask for inclusion in a core module on > > the other. > > Well, installed by default is ambiguous. If you're referring to kdebase, I > think that is not an option for Krusader (at least not in the current > situation). We're already shipping two filemanagers with it (while, with > KDE4, > we've tried really hard to get the number of apps in the standard modules > down > to one per type (i.e. one image viewer, one video player, ...). Extragear, > to > *me* sounds like a sensible option indeed, but ultimately it's up to module > maintainers where Krusader can find its home. > > > > what do you think guys? > > > > I'm all fo a move as soon as 2.0 is out of the door. What does the > > rest of the Krew think? > > Cheers, > -- > sebas > > http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAABAgAGBQJJLTW2AAoJEGdNh9WRGQ759JcIAIb77OkZcWQTEE43CPoKh4fC > 9d2s1SsDPik1r6tCdmwbtoKhyKU4JJLuh+4cVWoOyjEBu79+NENAlo3Ysudn56UV > 0BEJBk0+kJauZ0e02ri7nV08+g/EP9cWKVKWMr7KwAP8bW3HRG3CTYSzcybDNUVg > 1KmoDXniF7N4J52cH1T5lgShpSiWiUCnLISiZzO5M4i5z2j2sejO1P/mTUhdMHnu > G8m70kiCtZPVOHkR9eH+zMp3zi+0pNWJDxz5fnff5at+2AJ6GkyjU3JFrXRVXo4G > EwIsWBNiqYJgkU3sied04jCinmMEIyeJ0L9x+dpwNTiutMgsrWYkuASeBeFZEhI= > =wvve > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team