Re: [Kde-bindings] smokekde build failures in beta2 tarballs:

2012-06-11 Thread Stephan Kulow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10.06.2012 23:20, Tom Albers wrote: - Oorspronkelijk bericht - The version number seems to suggest otherwise, but 2.7.57 is more recent than 2.7.6. I'm slightly confused by this remark. Would anyone have the same idea when we release

Re: Observations and personal conclusions on the KDE release process since 4.0

2010-06-30 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Dienstag 29 Juni 2010 schrieb Wulf C. Krueger: Having been a KDE packager for several years now, I've looked at the releases of KDE since 4.0.0. I felt that the overall KDE release quality has become noticeably worse than it was during the 3.x days (during which I was most active). Hi

MALLOC_CHECK_

2010-01-10 Thread Stephan Kulow
Hi, Can we please take that out for the final 4.4? There are still plenty of ubuntu 9.10 installations with broken glibc out there ;( Greetings, Stephan ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org

Re: KDE 3.5.final?

2008-08-25 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: while it might be best to have everyone's hands on KDE4, it's also realistic that there will be those who remain interested in KDE3 for various reasons and there's no reason to try and control that beyond encouraging KDE4 to be the primary

Re: KDE 3.5.final?

2008-08-25 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Allen Winter: On Monday 25 August 2008 08:35:02 Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Montag 25 August 2008 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: while it might be best to have everyone's hands on KDE4, it's also realistic that there will be those who remain interested in KDE3

Re: Release of KDE 3.5.10

2008-08-20 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Mittwoch 20 August 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: On Wednesday 13 August 2008 00:36:06 Benoit Minisini wrote: I am currently committing patches to kicker for KDE 3.5.10. Those won't make it int 3.5.10, but if we gather enough changes, that would warrant a 3.5.11 in a couple of months. (I

Re: Release of KDE 3.5.10

2008-08-20 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Mittwoch 20 August 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: On Wednesday 13 August 2008 00:36:06 Benoit Minisini wrote: I am currently committing patches to kicker for KDE 3.5.10. Those won't make it int 3.5.10, but if we gather enough changes, that would warrant a 3.5.11 in a couple of months. (I

Re: KDE 3.5.10

2008-08-19 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 18 August 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: On Wednesday 13 August 2008 12:53:21 Stephan Kulow wrote: I will tag KDE 3.5.10 on tuesday, 19th and prepare tars for the packager. As the general interest in this release should be pretty limited, it will be in the hands of the promo team

Re: KDE 3.5.10

2008-08-19 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Dienstag 19 August 2008 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: A Dimarts 19 Agost 2008, Stephan Kulow va escriure: Am Dienstag 19 August 2008 schrieb Benoit Minisini: On mardi 19 août 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Montag 18 August 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: On Wednesday 13 August 2008 12

Re: KDE 3.5.10

2008-07-16 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Freitag 27 Juni 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: On Friday 27 June 2008 14:18:22 Stephan Kulow wrote: I asked the packagers the last days and there seems to be still high interest in the KDE 3.5 branch. 4 months have passed by now since 3.5.9 release and I would give it after KDE 4.1

Re: Almost forgot: 3.5.9...

2008-02-19 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 18 Februar 2008 schrieb Helio Chissini de Castro: On Mon 18 Feb 2008 11:59:31 Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Freitag 15 Februar 2008 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Hi, .. is on ktown for the packagers to grab since tuesday. So it looks like we can start rollout :) Is everything

Re: Almost forgot: 3.5.9...

2008-02-18 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Freitag 15 Februar 2008 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Hi, .. is on ktown for the packagers to grab since tuesday. So it looks like we can start rollout :) Is everything in place? I'd put the binary.inc and source.inc in place tomorrow and s,3.5.8,3.5.9, in the announcement if nothing else

Re: KDevelop 3.5.1 release

2008-02-13 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Dienstag 12 Februar 2008 schrieb Amilcar do Carmo Lucas: Hi all, We plan to release KDevelop 3.5.1 together with KDE 3.5.9. Can the KDE release team do that for us ? If not, what do we need to do ? I'll do it Greetings, Stephan ___

Re: KDE 3.5.9

2008-02-01 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2008 schrieb Allen Winter: On Friday 11 January 2008 12:08:44 Stephan Kulow wrote: Hi! I wanted to wait with it after 4.0 and I don't mind if we don't do it at all, but there were 327 commits not counting translations, so it would be justified. In case you

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-17 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Donnerstag 17 Januar 2008 schrieb Kevin Ottens: Le jeudi 17 janvier 2008, Stephan Kulow a écrit : Just in case you care: openSUSE would have a problem with September Doesn't it have a problem with July also? Well, at least 11.0 is announced for June 19, but maybe it's not set in stone

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-17 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Donnerstag 17 Januar 2008 schrieb Cornelius Schumacher: On Thursday 17 January 2008 01:14, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: I therefore propose to adopt a 6 months release schedule, starting to release in July with 4.1, then in January 2009 4.2, and so on. Given the fuzz which was made around

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-17 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Donnerstag 17 Januar 2008 schrieb Cornelius Schumacher: On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:01, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: On Thursday 17 January 2008 13:22:45 Cornelius Schumacher wrote: On Thursday 17 January 2008 01:14, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: I therefore propose to adopt a 6 months

Re: [24h] 6 months release schedule, 4.1 in July

2008-01-16 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Donnerstag 17 Januar 2008 schrieb Matt Rogers: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:14:28AM +0100, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: So I went through the recent emails regarding the release schedule. Since the discussion has fallen silent, I think pretty much everything has been said. My impression from

Re: KDE 4.1 planning

2008-01-08 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 07 Januar 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: Not sure about the root cause here, but Fedora, openSUSE and Ubuntu have 6 months schedules. For them, it's an advantage to have a new desktop version Sorry to step in, but openSUSE does not. Greetings, Stephan

Re: KDE Dev Platform Status

2007-11-25 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Sonntag 25 November 2007 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: A Diumenge 25 Novembre 2007, Allen Winter va escriure: Howdy, Are we willing to permit BIC changes to the Dev Platform? The question you need to make yourself is: Did we release the 4.0.0 for the Dev Platform?, techbase says yes, so

Re: PROPOSAL: Moving the KDEPIM Enterprise Branch into the 3.5 Branch

2007-10-11 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Donnerstag 11 Oktober 2007 schrieb David Faure: I think this would break all existing checkouts (including those on all the kde servers like anonsvn and mirrors, lxr, websvn, etc.) The (automated) svn update will barf with cannot replace directory from within or something like that. The

KDE 3.5.8 uploaded

2007-10-09 Thread Stephan Kulow
Hi! I tagged, packaged and uploaded KDE 3.5.8 to be grabbed by packagers. I would like to know if there is some spare time left to adapt the 3.5.7 release announcement :) I don't think we want to take away any of the shine from the 7th KConfig rewrite, but I guess some people might still be

Re: KDE 3.5.8

2007-10-05 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Freitag 05 Oktober 2007 schrieb Dirk Mueller: On Thursday, 4. October 2007, Rex Dieter wrote: +1, imo, flash-fix is post 3.5.8 territory. Besides, afaik, this only affect the flash beta, not the stable/released version (9.0.48.0 atm). Yep, so its better to act surprised after Adobe does

Re: KDE 3.5.8

2007-10-03 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Mittwoch 03 Oktober 2007 schrieb Dirk Mueller: On Wednesday, 3. October 2007, Stephan Kulow wrote: I don't think it makes sense to release KDE 3.5.8 without working flash support, this has to be fixed first. Without what? flash support. Flashplayer has moved to XEmbed

Re: KDE 3.5.8

2007-10-01 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 01 Oktober 2007 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: On 26.09.07 13:50:51, Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 21.09.07 10:02:43, Stephan Kulow wrote: Hi! It's been a while since KDE 3.5.7 (released may 22nd) and a lot has changed in the 3.5 branch since then, so I would like to release

Re: KDE 3.5.8

2007-10-01 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 01 Oktober 2007 schrieb Andras Mantia: On Monday 01 October 2007, Tom Albers wrote: I don't want want to flame as you request, but could you consider moving kdevelop to extragear-sdk? In that case you can determine for each release if you want to be part of it. We will just tag

Re: KDE 3.5.8

2007-10-01 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 01 Oktober 2007 schrieb Andras Mantia: So this would mean a need in scripty script each time a module (be it kdevelop, koffice or whatever) is packaged together or separately? Can't the kde-i18n packages be created per module? So let's say KDE 4.0 has kdelibs, kdepimlibs, kdebase

Re: KDE 3.5.8

2007-09-24 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Samstag 22 September 2007 schrieb Clarence Dang: On Friday 21 September 2007 6:02 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote: It's been a while since KDE 3.5.7 (released may 22nd) and a lot has changed in the 3.5 branch since then, so I would like to release another service pack. As the translators

KDE 3.5.8

2007-09-21 Thread Stephan Kulow
Hi! It's been a while since KDE 3.5.7 (released may 22nd) and a lot has changed in the 3.5 branch since then, so I would like to release another service pack. As the translators requested some clean up time, I suggest we go with October 7th as tagging date and release on 15th. Any objections?

Re: ERROR: there are duplicated POT files:

2007-08-07 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Dienstag 07 August 2007 schrieb Pino Toscano: Alle venerdì 03 agosto 2007, Stephan Kulow ha scritto: kcm_phonongst.pot phonon-gst.pot phonon-nmm.pot phonon_nmm_config.pot Fixed. Just a question: if I add a move/delete entry in the process_orphans.txt, should I remove the .pot

Re: ERROR: there are duplicated POT files:

2007-08-04 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Friday 03 August 2007 schrieb Stephan Kulow: kcm_phonongst.pot kdesktop.pot kdgantt1.pot kmid.pot kpager.pot krunner.pot libplasma.pot phonon-gst.pot phonon-nmm.pot phonon_nmm_config.pot Great progress! ERROR: there are duplicated POT files: +kaudiocreator.pot kcm_phonongst.pot

Re: ERROR: there are duplicated POT files:

2007-08-04 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Saturday 04 August 2007 schrieb Thomas Zander: On Saturday 04 August 2007 08:36:17 Stephan Kulow wrote:  kdgantt1.pot Allen was right, please remove the one coming from KOffice. We no longer svn-import kdgantt1 but we have kdgannt (which is v2) now. That one doesn't have any *.sh file

ERROR: there are duplicated POT files:

2007-08-03 Thread Stephan Kulow
kcm_phonongst.pot kdesktop.pot kdgantt1.pot kmid.pot kpager.pot krunner.pot libplasma.pot phonon-gst.pot phonon-nmm.pot phonon_nmm_config.pot ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: msgmerge trunk/l10n-kde4

2007-07-23 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 23 Juli 2007 schrieb CVS deamon: Find the full log at ftp://l10n.kde.org/logs/070723.trunk_l10n-kde4 --- /home/cvs/logs/070722.trunk_l10n-kde4 2007-07-22 07:52:20.0 +0200 +++ /home/cvs/logs/070723.trunk_l10n-kde4 2007-07-23 07:56:07.152604997 +0200 @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@

Re: Are We Ready? Beta1 vs. Alpha3

2007-07-23 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Montag 23 Juli 2007 schrieb Allen Winter: But maybe I'm wrong. Are we beta quality?? The libs on UNIX sure are. It's just tough to release only libs as final if we haven't software to test it with. Then again: tons of other libs are doing it all the time ;) It just would be a very first

3.5.X releases

2007-07-20 Thread Stephan Kulow
Hi! Perhaps the news spread to you already: I took more responsibility within SUSE and I'm now Project Manager for the openSUSE distribution and for the platform of our enterprise products (for those not working for a distribution: platform is everything that is shared core functionality of a

Re: Please take care of pot files

2007-07-16 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Monday 16 July 2007 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: On Monday 16 July 2007, Stephan Kulow wrote: Potentially obsolete .pot files: 2007-03-22 templates/messages/kdegraphics/kfile_gif.pot 2007-03-22 templates/messages/kdegraphics/kfile_jpeg.pot these two are obsolete, yes. they've moved

Re: Translations when acting on apps

2007-06-26 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Hi! Dear module maintainers: if you move or remove applications from your module, make sure you add an entry for that to /trunk/l10n-kde4/scripts/process_orphans.txt and follow the move/removal in the /trunk/l10n-kde4/templates/messages

Re: Renaming the next beta to alpha2?

2007-06-18 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Monday 18 June 2007 schrieb Tom Albers: Op zo 17 jun 2007 03:31 schreef u: On Sunday 17 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, the question is if we can deliver what a user expects from a beta, a complete desktop with some small bugs. give me a moment to recover from laughing.

Re: 3.5 Branch

2007-05-24 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Thursday 24 May 2007 schrieb Allen Winter: Is the 3.5 branch open for new i18n strings yet? I personally would leave the 3.5 branch frozen for the next couple of years. Greetings, Stephan ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org

Re: 3.5.7 - binary incompat (missing lib)

2007-05-15 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2007 schrieb Benjamin Reed: Stephan Kulow wrote: Hi! I uploaded KDE 3.5.7 for the packagers to grab from stable/3.5.7/src - so far untested. I see that libkabc_net went missing, and it appears to have a public header: kabcincludedir = $(includedir)/kabc

Re: [RFC] Draft Roadmap for KDE 4.0

2007-03-06 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Dienstag 06 März 2007 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: What do you think? What I think? Good you asked. Because if you continue discussing on this level we won't have another KDE release before 2012. I like Tom's approach: Define a roadmap with milestones and set dates to it. If a milestone