On Monday 20 Jul 2015 15:21:39 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:19 PM, laurent Montel <mon...@kde.org> wrote: > > Le Monday 20 July 2015, 06:45:31 Jeremy Whiting a écrit : > >> TLDR we can't release applications that depend on an unreleased > >> framework...> > > ? > > So we can release an application which depends on lib which is not > > released ? > Framework is a synonym for library. I wonder what they'll replace Framework with once there is a new paradigm? I wish we'd all stop finding new synonyms and stick with the original terminology. It was terrible watching all the justification for creating the name "Leap" - i guess i've been around the block too many times and i'm cynical. i'll go back to sleep now > It doesn't make a difference, I'd > say. Releasing with unreleased dependencies means that distributors > can't ship what we release, therefore it's a bogus release. > > Aleix > _______________________________________________ > KDE PIM mailing list kde-...@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim > KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team