Urs,
I just ran a conversion, and cloned the result and found two problems. One
is krfb git repo doesn't have kcm_krfb folder inside it. Looking at the
CMakeLists.txt it's not built anyway, but we need to find out why it's not
there at all imo.
The second problem is that kppp has many differenc
Hmm, actually looking deeper kcm_krfb in svn is an empty folder (not sure
what it's for...)
And the differences in kppp seem weird, http://paste.kde.org/759278/ but
shouldn't affect anything from what I can see. so maybe we're good to go?
should I push this into the main git repos and we can test
Jeremy, I think you can push into the main repos. The kppp thing looks
like some SVN keyword. I think this change doesn't hurt.
Once you pushed into the main repos, you can can notify me again. Then I
will test also and cherry-pick the build fixes into the 4.10 branch.
@Pali: You can run the
Kopete git conversion scripts on dewey started.
On Wednesday 05 June 2013 21:10:10 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> Jeremy, I think you can push into the main repos. The kppp
> thing looks like some SVN keyword. I think this change
> doesn't hurt.
>
> Once you pushed into the main repos, you can can notify me
Urs,
Ok, kdenetwork-filesharing, kdenetwork-strigi-analyzers, kdnssd, kget,
kppp, krdc and krfb pushed, tags pushed, hooks enabled, i18n branches set
in projects.kde.org settings, and they are enabled for development.
After kopete is migrated, will you replace the svn content with a README
file as
Hi Jeremy
Looks good, thanks a lot! :)
I have cherry-picked all standalone fixes into 4.10 branch. Everything
should build now in master and 4.10 (except Kopete, which is not online
yet).
I have also update documentation_paths and get_paths in trunk and branch
locally; I will commit these c
On Thursday 06 June 2013 09.33.53 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> Looks good, thanks a lot! :)
>
> I have cherry-picked all standalone fixes into 4.10 branch. Everything
> should build now in master and 4.10 (except Kopete, which is not online
> yet).
>
> I have also update documentation_paths
I just moved the kdeadmin and kdenetwork stuff from release-tools modules
to modules.git on master branch, next need to do something similar for
KDE/4.10 branch to package them in one tarball like I did in the past for
kdesdk and kdetoys. Anyway, the list is :
KDEAdmin {kuser, kdeadmin-strigi-anal
Hello,
all kopete repos were pushed to git.kde.org. I also enabled hooks
and development sites and configured trunk i18n branch.
When you delete kdenetwork from svn, can you delete also
playground and extragear kopete paths from svn? These are
converted in git too.
svn paths:
/trunk/playground/n
El Dijous, 6 de juny de 2013, a les 09:33:53, Urs Wolfer va escriure:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> Looks good, thanks a lot! :)
>
> I have cherry-picked all standalone fixes into 4.10 branch. Everything
> should build now in master and 4.10 (except Kopete, which is not online
> yet).
>
> I have also update d
El Dijous, 6 de juny de 2013, a les 22:26:17, Pali Rohár va escriure:
> Hello,
>
> all kopete repos were pushed to git.kde.org. I also enabled hooks
> and development sites and configured trunk i18n branch.
>
> When you delete kdenetwork from svn, can you delete also
> playground and extragear ko
On Thursday 06 June 2013 22:44:18 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dijous, 6 de juny de 2013, a les 22:26:17, Pali Rohár va
escriure:
> > Hello,
> >
> > all kopete repos were pushed to git.kde.org. I also enabled
> > hooks and development sites and configured trunk i18n
> > branch.
> >
> > When you
Kopete looks now also good. Thanks to everyone who has helped with the
migration work.
I should only replace (remove) things in SVN trunk, right?
Also, I have noticed one strange thing: Script Kiddy has removed
translation stuff from all .desktop files in all kdenetwork project
(e.g. [1]). Is
Urs,
I think we are good to go now. I believe scripty got confused because
there was still content in svn and git. Albert would know more though.
And yeah, I think replacing only on trunk is enough iirc.
BR,
Jeremy
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Urs Wolfer wrote:
> Kopete looks now also
Am Freitag, 7. Juni 2013, 11:38:52 schrieb Jeremy Whiting:
> Urs,
>
> I think we are good to go now. I believe scripty got confused because
> there was still content in svn and git. Albert would know more though.
> And yeah, I think replacing only on trunk is enough iirc.
>
> BR,
> Jeremy
>
>
Okay, everything is done now. Have fun with the migrated repositories :)
Bye
urs
On 2013-06-07 19:38, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
Urs,
I think we are good to go now. I believe scripty got confused
because there was still content in svn and git. Albert would know
more though. And yeah, I think re
You forgot to delete kopete-cryptography doc dir in extragear. I have done it:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/doc/kopete-cryptography/
On Saturday 08 June 2013 15:39:20 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> Okay, everything is done now. Have fun with the migrated
> repositories :)
>
> Bye
> urs
>
>
El Dijous, 6 de juny de 2013, a les 22:53:17, Pali Rohár va escriure:
> On Thursday 06 June 2013 22:44:18 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dijous, 6 de juny de 2013, a les 22:26:17, Pali Rohár va
>
> escriure:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > all kopete repos were pushed to git.kde.org. I also enabled
> >
Am Samstag, 8. Juni 2013, 15:39:20 schrieb Urs Wolfer:
> Okay, everything is done now. Have fun with the migrated repositories :)
>
Code in svn trunk/KDE/kdenetwork/ was replaced by a README about move to git,
but branches/KDE/4.10/kdenetwork/ has still the code for branch.
Code in branches kden
On 2013-06-09 13:41, Burkhard Lück wrote:
Am Samstag, 8. Juni 2013, 15:39:20 schrieb Urs Wolfer:
Okay, everything is done now. Have fun with the migrated repositories
:)
Code in svn trunk/KDE/kdenetwork/ was replaced by a README about move
to git,
but branches/KDE/4.10/kdenetwork/ has still
20 matches
Mail list logo