On 7/14/07, Cornelius Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Wade,
>
> On Saturday 14 July 2007 23:12, Wade Olson wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if it's because I wasn't at aAkKademy or not, but I'll
> > say it again: as someone who's done software for a long, long
> > time...this discussion makes
Op za 14 jul 2007 19:56 schreef u:
> Anyway, the marketing stuff comes below:
>
> This whole debate can be solved if we move to using release names
> rather than numbers. In that event we can totally pull the wool over
> the eyes of the press. eg: Windows XP == NT 5.1, but still had a big
> impact
Op Saturday 14 July 2007, schreef Troy Unrau:
> On 10/07/07, Thiago Macieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > >the aim is to create a 4.0 release in october (or whenever it is
> > >deemed "ready") without an official "to the rest of the world"
> > > announcement. this allows
Op Saturday 14 July 2007, schreef Troy Unrau:
> On 10/07/07, Thiago Macieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > >the aim is to create a 4.0 release in october (or whenever it is
> > >deemed "ready") without an official "to the rest of the world"
> > > announcement. this allows
Hi Wade,
On Saturday 14 July 2007 23:12, Wade Olson wrote:
>
> I don't know if it's because I wasn't at aAkKademy or not, but I'll
> say it again: as someone who's done software for a long, long
> time...this discussion makes my head hurt. Every email gets more
> absurd. I'm more prone at this p
On 7/14/07, jos poortvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op Saturday 14 July 2007, schreef Troy Unrau:
...
> > > I thought that was the plan all along. Why are we arguing about it then?
> > >
> > > Release Team gets code ready and tells Marketing Team: "here, release it
> > > when you find the best
On 10/07/07, Thiago Macieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >the aim is to create a 4.0 release in october (or whenever it is
> >deemed "ready") without an official "to the rest of the world"
> > announcement. this allows us to push 4.0 out to the community -and-
> > create a
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 3:02:54 pm Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >the aim is to create a 4.0 release in october (or whenever it is
> >deemed "ready") without an official "to the rest of the world"
> > announcement. this allows us to push 4.0 out to the community -and-
> > create
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>the aim is to create a 4.0 release in october (or whenever it is
>deemed "ready") without an official "to the rest of the world"
> announcement. this allows us to push 4.0 out to the community -and-
> create a media event on a day we can count on (e.g. past the day of
> sched
On Sunday 08 July 2007, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Gamma and RC are the same thing. Or are we trying to invent a *delta*
> release -- i.e., after the gamma/RC phase?
the aim is to create a 4.0 release in october (or whenever it is
deemed "ready") without an official "to the rest of the world" annou
Op ma 9 jul 2007 00:12 schreef u:
> On Sunday 08 July 2007 17:20, Tom Albers wrote:
> >
> > You might be right, but I still don't understand Cornelius' message.
>
> Sorry, I didn't notice that the original message I was replying to still was
> in the release-team list moderation queue. It seems t
On 7/9/07, Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Gamma" is a real release, but not targeted at new end users (so it really
> *is* 4.0, and *not* a release candidate. That thing has to be very clear.
>
> Troy's proposal, however, is about making a marketing splash about something
> that is
On Sunday 08 July 2007 17:20, Tom Albers wrote:
>
> You might be right, but I still don't understand Cornelius' message.
Sorry, I didn't notice that the original message I was replying to still was
in the release-team list moderation queue. It seems to have come through
meanwhile, so I hope my m
Troy Unrau wrote:
>The proposal is to add another layer to the release stack called 'gamma'
> or similar. The release cycle up until Oct 23rd would remain
> unchanged, except perhaps the RC sections might need to be renamed as
> gamma candidate, for instance.
The way I see it, calling it "gamma"
On 7/8/07, Allen Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As some of us are not subscribed to kde-ev-marketing, could we please
> have a little more background? Like what is the gamma proposal
> and what is "Mountainview"??
Mountain View California is the city where Google has its
headquarters. It's
Op zo 8 jul 2007 17:15 schreef u:
> Allen Winter pravi:
> > As some of us are not subscribed to kde-ev-marketing, could we please
> > have a little more background? Like what is the gamma proposal
> > and what is "Mountainview"??
>
> I think that the gamma is about calling version 4.0 release a g
Allen Winter pravi:
> As some of us are not subscribed to kde-ev-marketing, could we please
> have a little more background? Like what is the gamma proposal
> and what is "Mountainview"??
I think that the gamma is about calling version 4.0 release a gamma
release and that Mountain View is related
As some of us are not subscribed to kde-ev-marketing, could we please
have a little more background? Like what is the gamma proposal
and what is "Mountainview"??
On Saturday 07 July 2007 9:33:56 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007 18:55, Troy Unrau wrote:
> >
> > The proposal
On Friday 06 July 2007 18:55, Troy Unrau wrote:
>
> The proposal is to add another layer to the release stack called 'gamma' or
> similar. The release cycle up until Oct 23rd would remain unchanged,
> except perhaps the RC sections might need to be renamed as gamma candidate,
> for instance.
Afte
19 matches
Mail list logo
