Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-06 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday 05 December 2008 12:48:59 Tom Albers wrote: Communicate that bugfixing is still a top priority until 4.2.0 is released. You said it yourself: bug fixing is top priority, why make it more difficult? I am against prematurely thawing trunk as quite a few developers will shift

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-06 Thread Allen Winter
On Saturday 06 December 2008 4:00:40 am Sebastian Kügler wrote: IMO, we should branch at -rc1, not earlier. Ok. I was simply trying to find a compromise. I'm not strongly in favor of early branching. Bottom Line: we stick to the current schedules; branch 4.2 at rc1 (at the earliest); 4.1.4

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-05 Thread Tom Albers
Op vrijdag 05 december 2008 02:18 schreef u: Howdy, Based upon the recent reopen trunk for KDE 4.3 thread, I humbly submit the following proposal: 1) 4.2 Beta2 is tagged on 9 December (already scheduled) 2) 4.2 is branched on 10 December 2) Trunk is wide-open for 4.3 immediately

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-05 Thread David Faure
On Friday 05 December 2008, Allen Winter wrote: Howdy, Based upon the recent reopen trunk for KDE 4.3 thread, I humbly submit the following proposal: 1) 4.2 Beta2 is tagged on 9 December (already scheduled) 2) 4.2 is branched on 10 December 2) Trunk is wide-open for 4.3 immediately

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-05 Thread Dominik Haumann
On Friday 05 December 2008, Allen Winter wrote: Howdy, [...] Communicate that bugfixing is still a top priority until 4.2.0 is released. I think you can't stress this enough as committing twice is an additional burden, and at this point it's especially important that the fixes get into the

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-05 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008, um 11:44 Uhr, schrieb Lucas Murray: You said it yourself: bug fixing is top priority, why make it more difficult? I am against prematurely thawing trunk as quite a few developers will shift from bug fixing into feature development (I can see myself doing this)

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-05 Thread Tom Albers
Op vrijdag 05 december 2008 11:44 schreef u: On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Allen Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy, Based upon the recent reopen trunk for KDE 4.3 thread, I humbly submit the following proposal: 1) 4.2 Beta2 is tagged on 9 December (already scheduled) 2) 4.2

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-05 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Friday 05 December 2008 12:48:59 Tom Albers wrote: Yeah, that's what I was thinking until recently, after that I realised that some applications do not contain obvious bugs and that they want to continue with features. Also you can also see the support for the 'always summer in trunk' idea

Re: A Proposal: EOL 4.1, Branch 4.2, Start 4.3

2008-12-05 Thread Tom Albers
Op vrijdag 05 december 2008 13:47 schreef u: On Friday 05 December 2008 12:48:59 Tom Albers wrote: Yeah, that's what I was thinking until recently, after that I realised that some applications do not contain obvious bugs and that they want to continue with features. Also you can also see