Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 18 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va > > escriure: > > On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > > > > > > > > Alex > > >

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > > > > > > Alex > > > > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required, > which is 2.8.10.1 currently. > We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable. > I see. My post seems to date back then when it was disc

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > Hello, > > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > > > > Alex > > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. > With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch > needed. The attached pat

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 17 December 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va > > > > escriure: > > > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antoni

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va > escriure: > > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis > Tsiapaliokas > > > va> > > > escriure: > > >> Hello, > >

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va > escriure: >> Hello, >> >>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ? >>> >>> Alex >> >> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. >> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure: > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas > > va> > > escriure: > >> Hello, > >> > >>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > >>> > >>> Alex > >> > >>

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va escriure: > Hello, > > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > > > > Alex > > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. > With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached p

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Antonis Tsiapaliokas
Hello, > Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > > Alex > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch needed. Regards, Antonis ___ release-team mailing l

Re: Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dissabte, 15 de desembre de 2012, a les 15:41:37, Alexander Neundorf va > > escriure: > > On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with > > > cmake 2.8

Re: Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 15 de desembre de 2012, a les 15:41:37, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with > > cmake 2.8.8 > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsyste

Re: Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with > cmake 2.8.8 > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7589 > http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-December/006566.html > > But cmake 2.8

Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Albert Astals Cid
There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with cmake 2.8.8 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7589 http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-December/006566.html But cmake 2.8.8 is what we are requiring at the global kdelibs level. Should we: