On Tuesday 18 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va
>
> escriure:
> > On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> > >
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va
escriure:
> On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> > >
> > > Alex
> >
> > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required,
> which is 2.8.10.1 currently.
> We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable.
>
I see.
My post seems to date back then when it was disc
On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> >
> > Alex
>
> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch
> needed.
The attached pat
On Monday 17 December 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antoni
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va
> escriure:
> > Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis
> Tsiapaliokas
> > > va>
> > > escriure:
> > >> Hello,
> >
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va
> escriure:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>
>> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
>> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure:
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas
> > va>
> > escriure:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> >>>
> >>> Alex
> >>
> >>
El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va
escriure:
> Hello,
>
> > Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> >
> > Alex
>
> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached p
Hello,
> Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
>
> Alex
>
I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch
needed.
Regards,
Antonis
___
release-team mailing l
On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dissabte, 15 de desembre de 2012, a les 15:41:37, Alexander Neundorf va
>
> escriure:
> > On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with
> > > cmake 2.8
El Dissabte, 15 de desembre de 2012, a les 15:41:37, Alexander Neundorf va
escriure:
> On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with
> > cmake 2.8.8
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsyste
On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with
> cmake 2.8.8
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7589
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-December/006566.html
>
> But cmake 2.8
There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with cmake
2.8.8
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7589
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-December/006566.html
But cmake 2.8.8 is what we are requiring at the global kdelibs level.
Should we:
14 matches
Mail list logo