Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2008-01-07 Thread Allen Winter
On Saturday 05 January 2008 20:57:52 Allen Winter wrote: > On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote: > > I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk. > > > > Bye > > urs > > I will do so. But first I need to add 4.1 apidox to api.kde.org. > > Should I enable all K

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2008-01-06 Thread Allen Winter
On Sunday 06 January 2008 16:27:17 Matt Rogers wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Sunday 06 January 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > >> On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote: > >>> I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk. > >>> > >

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2008-01-06 Thread Matt Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 6, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Sunday 06 January 2008, Allen Winter wrote: >> On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote: >>> I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk. >>> >>> Bye >>> urs >>

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2008-01-06 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote: > > I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk. > > > > Bye > > urs > > I will do so. But first I need to add 4.1 apidox to api.kde.org. > > Should I enable all Krazy check

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2008-01-05 Thread Allen Winter
On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote: > I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk. > > Bye > urs I will do so. But first I need to add 4.1 apidox to api.kde.org. Should I enable all Krazy checks in extragear, playground, kdereview and koffice too? ___

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2008-01-05 Thread Matt Rogers
On Jan 5, 2008, at 7:14 AM, Urs Wolfer wrote: > I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk. > > Bye > urs Agreed. Now that trunk is open again for all commits, let's go ahead and reenable those checks. -- Matt ___ release-team m

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2008-01-05 Thread Urs Wolfer
I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk. Bye urs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-21 Thread David Faure
On Tuesday 20 November 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote: > i18ncheckarg: Check validity of i18n calls This one should probably be enabled, i18n misuse triggers real bugs. The rest is more cosmetic indeed. -- David Faure, [EMAIL PROTECTED], sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.kon

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-20 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Friday 16 November 2007, Allen Winter wrote: > captruefalse: Check for TRUE and FALSE macros > contractions: Check for contractions in strings > cpp: Check for cpp macros and usage > doublequote_chars: Check for single char QStrings better written as a QChar > emptystrcompare: Check for QString

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-18 Thread Matt Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Allen Winter wrote: > On Monday 12 November 2007 07:51:41 Dirk Mueller wrote: >> On Sunday 11 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> >>> Can we have it back already? >> >> I`m not opposed to re-enabling it, as long a

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-16 Thread Allen Winter
On Monday 12 November 2007 07:51:41 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Sunday 11 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Can we have it back already? > > I`m not opposed to re-enabling it, as long as the number of checks that are > enabled are important to us (e.g. the licensing check). I do not wan

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dilluns 12 Novembre 2007, Matt Rogers va escriure: > On Nov 11, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Can we have it back already? > > > > Please? > > > > Albert > > Please justify why you need it. Because it's useful, that's a reason by itself, if you want particular examples "I want

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-12 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Sunday 11 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Can we have it back already? I`m not opposed to re-enabling it, as long as the number of checks that are enabled are important to us (e.g. the licensing check). I do not want another round of FALSE/TRUE renames and other sort of stuff hitti

Re: Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-11 Thread Matt Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 11, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Can we have it back already? > > Please? > > Albert Please justify why you need it. If you're running out of things to work on, there are plenty of bugs in trunk. :) - -- Matt -BEGIN PG

Bringing ebn krazy back

2007-11-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Can we have it back already? Please? Albert ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team