On Monday 21 April 2008 16:12:08 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Monday 21 April 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > * if we want WoC and other necessary steps forward in plasma in a
> > rational time frame (e.g. not next year), occassional blips like this
> > will happen and be necessary. bitching about how
On Monday 21 April 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> * if we want WoC and other necessary steps forward in plasma in a rational
> time frame (e.g. not next year), occassional blips like this will happen
> and be necessary. bitching about how it will affect an *alpha* release is
> shortsighted
I have
On Monday 21 April 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Lets redecide on Wednesday afternoon, okay? No matter how complex the code
> is, it should be able to get something that starts until then.
wel, of course it starts. what we're saying is that if you want a taskbar and
system tray that work reliably,
On Monday 21 April 2008, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> restarting plasma without panel. The systray is apparently broken, and
> there are some layouting glitches in the panel right now.
>
> It's getting closer, though :-)
I'd rather not delay it. I can delay until Thursday/Friday.. that should be
e
On Monday 21 April 2008 11:18:04 Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Sunday 20 April 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > but a contingency for a plasma (or even workspace as a whole if
> > that's easier? crappy for the kwin guys though =/ ) from the 10th is
> > probably smart.
>
> That's not that easy. I tried t
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> but a contingency for a plasma (or even workspace as a whole if
> that's easier? crappy for the kwin guys though =/ ) from the 10th is
> probably smart.
That's not that easy. I tried to compile now trunk without updating
kdebase, and kdepim fails t
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Sunday 20 April 2008 06:09:22 Tom Albers wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand
> > from IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the
> > current state is less than wh
On Sunday 20 April 2008 06:09:22 Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from
> IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current
> state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testing user base.
>
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from
> IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current
> state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testing user base.
>
> I know
Le Sunday 20 April 2008 01:09:22 pm Tom Albers, vous avez écrit :
> Hi Guys,
>
> On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from
> IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current
> state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testin
Hi Guys,
On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from IRC
the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current state
is less than what we want to display to our alpha testing user base.
I know KDE is /a lot/ more than plasma, but I feel the ove
11 matches
Mail list logo
