Documenting dependencies (Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers)

2016-04-23 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 16 April 2016 20:59:46 Michael Pyne wrote: > > But a simple solution might be to simply tag kde-build-metadata along with > the > rest of KF5 and Plasma 5 when we do a release, as a way to baking in what we > thought the dependencies were for each release. +1 No need for

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El divendres, 15 d’abril de 2016, a les 19:33:42 CEST, Raymond Wooninck va escriure: > On Friday, 15 April 2016 13:39:58 CEST Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Il giorno Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:27:32 +0200 > > > > Luca Beltrame ha scritto: > > > Follow up: this is being worked on. > > >

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-16 Thread Michael Pyne
On Sat, April 16, 2016 08:49:10 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote: > > I understand that the CI tools need to be able to resolve > > interdependencies. So, why not use CI functionality to generate a global > > dependency list and

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-15 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > Please understand this. > As a distro packager, I would welcome a simple piece of documentation > written by the developer that is *not* a CMakeLists.txt

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-15 Thread Eric Hameleers
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Martin Graesslin wrote: Please understand this. As a distro packager, I would welcome a simple piece of documentation written by the developer that is *not* a CMakeLists.txt file. At Plasma we are currently discussing a metadata format for our projects including the

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-15 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Friday, April 15, 2016 8:58:32 PM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:21:24 PM CEST Eric Hameleers wrote: > >> >> I assume these belong to KDEPIM. Where is their build order documented > >>

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-15 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:21:24 PM CEST Eric Hameleers wrote: >> >> I assume these belong to KDEPIM. Where is their build order documented >> >> - also in relation to the other pre-existing tarballs? >> > >> > In

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Fri, 15 Apr 2016 07:26:10 +0200 Luca Beltrame ha scritto: > and GPL3. which are incompatible. This has been found by the legal > team at openSUSE. Follow up: this is being worked on. pgpuopO5BfEGO.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-14 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:21:24 PM CEST Eric Hameleers wrote: > >> I assume these belong to KDEPIM. Where is their build order documented > >> - also in relation to the other pre-existing tarballs? > > > > In their CMakeLists.txt, in the kde-build-metadata repo and in the totally > > random

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-14 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:26:31 +0200 Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: Hello Albert, > Haven't had time to compile yet, will try to get to it on monday > since this weekend i'm away at Akademy-es. There are licensing issues in KDE PIM that might prevent its distribution: in

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-14 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dijous, 14 d’abril de 2016, a les 14:21:24 CEST, Eric Hameleers va escriure: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El dijous, 14 d?abril de 2016, a les 13:42:18 CEST, Eric Hameleers va > > > > escriure: > >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >>> At the usual

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-14 Thread Eric Hameleers
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: El dijous, 14 d?abril de 2016, a les 13:42:18 CEST, Eric Hameleers va escriure: On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: At the usual location. Haven't had time to compile yet, will try to get to it on monday since this weekend i'm away at

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-14 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dijous, 14 d’abril de 2016, a les 13:42:18 CEST, Eric Hameleers va escriure: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > At the usual location. > > > > Haven't had time to compile yet, will try to get to it on monday since > > this > > weekend i'm away at Akademy-es. > > > >

Re: KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-14 Thread Eric Hameleers
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: At the usual location. Haven't had time to compile yet, will try to get to it on monday since this weekend i'm away at Akademy-es. REVISIONS_AND_HASHES file at https://paste.kde.org/pfq4epsxp Cheers, Albert Albert, there is a great many new

KDE Applications 16.04.0 packages available for packagers

2016-04-14 Thread Albert Astals Cid
At the usual location. Haven't had time to compile yet, will try to get to it on monday since this weekend i'm away at Akademy-es. REVISIONS_AND_HASHES file at https://paste.kde.org/pfq4epsxp Cheers, Albert ___ release-team mailing list