On Samstag, 19. März 2022 12:33:33 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dissabte, 19 de març de 2022, a les 9:02:35 (CET), Tobias C. Berner va
escriure:
> > 2) libkgapi requires kf5-5.92 but does not say so in CMakeLists.txt
>
> I've updated the minimum required version now.
>
> On a personal
El dissabte, 19 de març de 2022, a les 9:02:35 (CET), Tobias C. Berner va
escriure:
> Moin moin
>
> Two things:
>
> 1) there are two versioning schemes present
> * libKF5BalooWidgets.so.22.03.80
> * libastro.so.22.3.80
> This inconsistency is a minor annoyance in packaging.
>
> 2) libkgapi
El dissabte, 19 de març de 2022, a les 9:02:35 (CET), Tobias C. Berner va
escriure:
> Moin moin
>
> Two things:
>
> 1) there are two versioning schemes present
> * libKF5BalooWidgets.so.22.03.80
> * libastro.so.22.3.80
> This inconsistency is a minor annoyance in packaging.
That seems like
Moin moin
Two things:
1) there are two versioning schemes present
* libKF5BalooWidgets.so.22.03.80
* libastro.so.22.3.80
This inconsistency is a minor annoyance in packaging.
2) libkgapi requires kf5-5.92 but does not say so in CMakeLists.txt
mfg Tobias
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 00:27,
El divendres, 18 de març de 2022, a les 23:36:33 (CET), Antonio Rojas va
escriure:
> El viernes, 18 de marzo de 2022 15:08:53 (CET), Albert Astals Cid escribió:
> > https://kde.org/info/releases-22.03.80/
> > Please test :)
>
> Hi,
> kmag wants a non-existant 0.4.2 version of
On Friday, 18 March 2022 23:36:33 CET, Antonio Rojas wrote:
El viernes, 18 de marzo de 2022 15:08:53 (CET), Albert Astals Cid escribió:
https://kde.org/info/releases-22.03.80/
Please test :)
Hi,
kmag wants a non-existant 0.4.2 version of qaccessibilityclient.
Considering it builds just
El viernes, 18 de marzo de 2022 15:08:53 (CET), Albert Astals Cid escribió:
https://kde.org/info/releases-22.03.80/
Please test :)
Hi,
kmag wants a non-existant 0.4.2 version of qaccessibilityclient.
El divendres, 18 de març de 2022, a les 16:17:01 (CET), Sven Brauch va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for caring.
>
> On 3/18/22 15:08, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > There's a python310 branch, but I don't have much information if
> > distros shipping 3.10 should better not ship
Hi,
thank you very much for caring.
On 3/18/22 15:08, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
There's a python310 branch, but I don't have much information if
distros shipping 3.10 should better not ship kdev-python at all or if
that branch is worth testing. Sven?
That branch does NOT work, it will
https://kde.org/info/releases-22.03.80/
Everything built locally *except* kdev-python
It is a known problem with python 3.10
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438206
There's a python310 branch, but I don't have much information if distros
shipping 3.10 should better not ship kdev-python at
10 matches
Mail list logo