Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-06-19 Thread Allen Winter
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 16:04:25 Stefan Böhmann wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to get an overview about the current state of each application in > kdetoys and want to share my cognitions and also I want to make a proposal. > > In short: I think the kdetoys module is dead. Where are we on this initia

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-06-12 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > On Thursday 12 June 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > > On Thursday 12 June 2008 08:58:13 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > btw, not having a place to house plasma add-ons that aren't tied to a > > > kde release is a bit of a pain. i can see extragea

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-06-12 Thread Helio Chissini de Castro
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > On Thursday 12 June 2008 08:58:13 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Thursday 12 June 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > > > BTW: do we have someone taking module coordinatorship for kdeplasmoids? > > > > that would be me i 'pose, since i was doing that for the ex

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-06-12 Thread Allen Winter
On Thursday 12 June 2008 08:58:13 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday 12 June 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > > BTW: do we have someone taking module coordinatorship for kdeplasmoids? > > that would be me i 'pose, since i was doing that for the extragear version > of it. OK, I'll add that info to the

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-06-12 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Allen Winter wrote: > BTW: do we have someone taking module coordinatorship for kdeplasmoids? that would be me i 'pose, since i was doing that for the extragear version of it. btw, not having a place to house plasma add-ons that aren't tied to a kde release is a bit of

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-06-12 Thread Allen Winter
On Thursday 12 June 2008 08:07:07 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:03:38 Dirk Mueller wrote: > > On Friday 09 May 2008, Tom Albers wrote: > > > > So, we really need amor, for very selfish reasons like keeping mom > > > > happy. > > > > > > Maybe move it to kdebase. It is an ess

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-06-12 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:03:38 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Friday 09 May 2008, Tom Albers wrote: > > > So, we really need amor, for very selfish reasons like keeping mom > > > happy. > > > > Maybe move it to kdebase. It is an essential part of the desktop. > > It is *not* an essential part of the des

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-20 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Friday 09 May 2008, Tom Albers wrote: > > So, we really need amor, for very selfish reasons like keeping mom > > happy. > Maybe move it to kdebase. It is an essential part of the desktop. It is *not* an essential part of the desktop. -100 for moving it to kdebase. I'm fine with kdegames if w

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-11 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2008, um 13:01 Uhr, schrieb Stefan Böhmann: > > > > 8. kteatime > > > > I ported this application to KDE4 and took care of it since then. > > > > > > No objections to moving kteatime into kdeut

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-09 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2008, um 13:01 Uhr, schrieb Stefan Böhmann: > > > 8. kteatime > > > I ported this application to KDE4 and took care of it since then. > > > > No objections to moving kteatime into kdeutils, if Friedrich is ok with > > that. Or to extragear. > > Ok - I prefer to move kteatime and

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-09 Thread Tom Albers
Op vrijdag 09 mei 2008 16:19 schreef u: > So, we really need amor, for very selfish reasons like keeping mom > happy. +1 Maybe move it to kdebase. It is an essential part of the desktop. Toma___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-09 Thread Allen Winter
On Friday 09 May 2008 10:19:13 Mauricio Piacentini wrote: > >I sorta like little amor. so cute :) > > > So, we really need amor, for very selfish reasons like keeping mom > happy. I will have a look at it (did not know it was unmaintained), but > it does not seem to have critical bugs at first g

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-09 Thread Mauricio Piacentini
>I sorta like little amor. so cute :) Amor is the main reason my mom likes his older Linux/KDE box better than my stepfather's more powerful Win machine. She keeps teasing him that he does not have a pet cat that follows here around while surfing the internet. And she speaks with the cat too

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-09 Thread Stefan Böhmann
Hi, kmoon, fifteenapplet and eyesapplet were allready removed when I wrote (more precisely when I send) my mail. Sorry for that. On 5/7/08, Stefan Böhmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When the new plasma based world clock is ready in time for kde 4.1 also > kworkdclock could be moved to tags/un

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-08 Thread Allen Winter
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 16:04:25 Stefan Böhmann wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to get an overview about the current state of each application in > kdetoys and want to share my cognitions and also I want to make a proposal. > > In short: I think the kdetoys module is dead. > Certainly in need of some lov

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-08 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 08 May 2008, Will Stephenson wrote: > The summary plugin works but it was just getting empty strings back from > the weather service when i disabled it a couple of weeks ago. Plasma's > weather engine could supply the data but it's tied to Plasma, and Kontact > is explicitly designed t

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-08 Thread Will Stephenson
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Pino Toscano said: > > 4. kweather > > kweather is something curious. Some parts are ported (kweatherreport and > > kweatherservice) > > AFAIR, kweather has a service running on DCOP/D-Bus for getting the weather > data, and clients communicate to it via the bus wire. > >

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-07 Thread Sebastian Kuegler
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 23:08:32 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Stefan Böhmann wrote: > > In short: I think the kdetoys module is dead. > > even in KDE 3.x times it was used as a testing module for build system > changes (because it is small and compiles quickly) :) > > I think I'

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-07 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Stefan Böhmann wrote: > In short: I think the kdetoys module is dead. even in KDE 3.x times it was used as a testing module for build system changes (because it is small and compiles quickly) :) I think I'm fine with moving the stuff into an extragear module and just n

Re: the future of kdetoys

2008-05-07 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, > 1. kmoon This was removed from trunk (4.1) some weeks ago, already. The reason is the one you said, plasma_applet_luna. > 4. kweather > kweather is something curious. Some parts are ported (kweatherreport and > kweatherservice) AFAIR, kweather has a service running on DCOP/D-Bus for getti

the future of kdetoys

2008-05-07 Thread Stefan Böhmann
Hi, I tried to get an overview about the current state of each application in kdetoys and want to share my cognitions and also I want to make a proposal. In short: I think the kdetoys module is dead. Most of the 8 applications in kdetoys aren't in a good state. 1. kmoon this applet is dead. c