7th Cir RLUIPA decision

2005-02-01 Thread Anthony Picarello
Posner restores meaning to "substantial burden" within the 7th Circuit in Sts. Constantine & Helen v. City of New Berlin, 04-2326 (7th Cir., Feb. 1, 2005): http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/op3.fwx?submit1=showop&caseno=04-2326.PDF Enforcement Clause constitutionality is not addressed directly, but

(no subject)

2005-02-01 Thread RJLipkin
Apologies to the List. I did not intend my post to Steve Jamar to be sent to the List.   Bobby   Robert Justin LipkinProfessor of LawWidener University School of LawDelaware ___ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscrib

Re: God in the Constitution

2005-02-01 Thread RJLipkin
Steve. thanks for your illuminating post.  Best, Bobby.   Robert Justin LipkinProfessor of LawWidener University School of LawDelaware ___ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password,

Re: God in the Constitution

2005-02-01 Thread Steven Jamar
Bobby, Thanks for the helpful summing up. The Egyptian Constitution originally noted the Shariah (Islamic law) as a source of law. It was more recently amended (15 or so years ago) to make the Shariah the source of law. I think one plausible reason god is not mentioned is the very varied concep

Re: God in the Constitution

2005-02-01 Thread RJLipkin
I agree that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are different types of documents, with different purposes and functions. And I have argued against reading the Constitution through the lens of the Declaration without an extraordinary justification for doing so.  But