Jean,
Many have argued that there are secular reasons for denying marriage
(or some variant) to same gender couples. I don't agree with the
reasoning, but I disagree that denying same gender couples marriage
lacks secular reasons (whether or not one agrees with those reasons).
Every secular
One of the reasons list members may not be jumping in to discuss this
question is that it is such a hard question to answer. Many of us believe
that courts should consider the harm to third parties or the public good in
setting limits to the scope of permissible legislative accommodations. I
Much of this interesting
discussion about the constitutional implications of "harm to others" has taken
place absent even a semblance of a seriousanalysis of the concept of
"harm." (The classic analysis of "harm" in the last several decades can be
found, I suggest,in Joel Feinberg's trilogy
In the March 21, 2005 New Yorker is an article entitled Jesus in the Classroom about Williams' suit in Cupertino -- the falsely balleyhooed School District Bans the Declaration of Independence case.
There is a related discussion at http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/?050321on_onlineonly01 .