RE: Top Navy JAG Judge rules Chaplain "properly punished" for sermoninoptionally-attended chapel

2006-06-29 Thread Alan Brownstein
Placing the particulars of Chaplain Klingenschmitt’s case to the side for the moment, and assuming arguendo that military chaplain’s have considerable religious autonomy with regard to the content of the worship services they conduct, are there circumstances in which military authorities ca

Top Navy JAG Judge rules Chaplain "properly punished" for sermon inoptionally-attended chapel

2006-06-29 Thread Gordon James Klingenschmitt
I'm grateful for Professor Friedman's blogging, and for Marty Lederman's thoughtful views on "speaking as a government employee."    But just to remind everybody, US Code and Case Law both clearly define speech by military chaplains as NOT government speech, rather RELIGIOUS speech representing

RE: HR 2679: Fee-Shifting in Constitutional Cases

2006-06-29 Thread Douglas Laycock
Greg's concerns might support an across the board amendment to §1988, but they have nothing to do with a bill that targets only the Establishment Clause for complete loss of fees. On the broader point, there are many obstacles to fee awards already, including defendant's ability to litigate to

RE: HR 2679: Fee-Shifting in Constitutional Cases

2006-06-29 Thread marty . lederman
For what it's worth, back in 2000 there were similar legislative proposals to cut off fees for particular types of Establishment Clause claims (dealing with student _expression_ and memorials).  The sole or principal justification in that case appeared to be Congress's opposition to the decisions

RE: HR 2679: Fee-Shifting in Constitutional Cases

2006-06-29 Thread Marc Stern
When I testified against HR 2679,I proposed  that, if the concern were truly with the burden fees posed(as opposed to disagreement with the Establishment  Clause which seems in fact to be the cause of complaint) the bill be amended to allow Judges to deny fees when a governmental body is fa