While you're all waiting with bated breath to read all the amicus briefs
(more the 54 so far), here's yet another post, this one on the question of
religious exercise by for-profit corporations and their
owners/employees/directors:

http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/01/hobby-lobby-part-v-whose-religious.html

I fear that there'll be much in the amicus briefs that might cause me to
reconsider some of what I wrote here; but it's a perspective I haven't seen
yet in the briefs, decisions and blogposts, so I thought I'd get it out
there for your consideration before we all go down the rabbit hole . . . .
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to