Thank you for the kind words to all the list members who spoke up.
This attack comes from only two students; the gay rights groups on on Grounds
read the brief I helped write in the marriage cases and declined to join in.
The two students have gotten undue attention in the press, presumably bec
Sorry – I think I misread the initial attack on you as an attack
on Paul. It all just merged into a massive ball of ad hominem in my mind
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Hillel Y. Levin
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2
Mr. Green,
Law and religion academics have been disagreeing with Doug Laycock for years on
the meaning of and proper scope of religious freedom. Prof. Laycock is well
aware of the substantive impact of the issues he addresses — or as aware if
those impacts as one can be on something so uncert
Eugene:
I take it you have no problem with Mr. Green's personal attacks on me? ;-)
On Sunday, May 25, 2014, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
>Mr. Green: This is an academic discussion list, for
> substantive arguments of substantive legal questions having to do with the
> law of governmen
Mr. Green: You obviously take a dim view of the value of the
list, and thus seem not terribly interested in maintaining the value of the
list (at least as those of us who do value the list understand it). There are
many forums online in which you can express your views. But you
I see I've touched a nerve with some pompous profs. How about discussing
the article rather than clutching your pseudo-academic pearls??
---Jimmy Green
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
>Mr. Green: This is an academic discussion list, for
> substantive ar
This list is primarily a vehicle for academic self-promotion so drop the
sanctimony Volokh...
---Jimmy green
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:27 PM, jim green wrote:
> Is this the same Eugene Volokh who is obsessed with gay men converting
> him? The same one who supported ex-gay conversion therapy?
Mr. Green: This is an academic discussion list, for substantive
arguments of substantive legal questions having to do with the law of
government and religion. Please focus on substantive argument, rather than
personal attacks, whether on Prof. Horwitz, Prof. Laycock, or me, and
Is this the same Eugene Volokh who is obsessed with gay men converting him?
The same one who supported ex-gay conversion therapy? The same one who
claimed gay sex was inherently dangerous?
A stroll through your blog is a case study of a closet case...
---Jimmy Green
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:
I see Horowitz is fast out of the gate defending Laycock as usual. I have
responded ad nauseum to you in your comments section of your blog but as
usual you deflect with a slew of questions as if I were your student in
some parody of The Paper Chase...
Ask me a serious question and I'll give you
I see – “scandal” means “expressing views you disagree with.”
Have you actually read the work of Doug Laycock (one of the top Religion
Clauses scholars in the country)? Do you have a substantive response to his
substantive arguments? Or is your view based on, to borrow a term,
Could you be more specific? What is it you suppose Prof. Laycock to have done
that puts him in the same company as Regnerus? Are you suggesting that his work
fails academic standards? That any relevant work as counsel was subject to
different standards than those that apply to other lawyers? If
Says the straight male UGA law professor. I see UGA hasn't changed all
that much in the almost 20 years since I received my JD. The outright
bigotry was expected but the smug "I have gay friends but..." heterosexism
that Professor Levin exemplifies was worse in many respects.
---Jimmy Green
UGA
I don't agree with Doug's views on these issues, but this is an obscene
witch hunt.
On Sunday, May 25, 2014, jim green wrote:
> Too bad it took a few brave college students to do what "responsible
> academics" (including many on this list) have failed to do for years...
>
>
> http://www.timesdis
Too bad it took a few brave college students to do what "responsible
academics" (including many on this list) have failed to do for years...
http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/latest-news-ap/lgbt-activists-take-u-va-professor-to-task-for-stance/article_fa5680ce-e36e-11e3-a4ed-0017a43b2370.html
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
