A similar hypothetical (but one more legally plausible in states beyond
Nevada) would be a racist surrogate. Someone who offers to carry a child
in exchange for money, but only if she approves of the race of the parents.
A quick Google search shows that discrimination by surrogates has already
be
antithetical to sound
> >> science, that would be a fair ground of criticism. But if he is sound
> when
> >> he talks about science, and the only evidence against him is the
> inferences
> >> people draw when he talks about religion, that is simply a rel
und of criticism. But if he is sound when
> he talks about science, and the only evidence against him is the inferences
> people draw when he talks about religion, that is simply a religious
> disqualification.
>
>
>
>
>
> Quoting Anthony Decinque :
>
> > Francis Col
minate against a job candidate on the grounds that the candidate
believes, practices, and advocates for ideas that are antithetical to the
values underlying the job? (Again, assuming that the candidate would not
otherwise abuse the post and would generally do a fine administrative job.)
Thanks,
A
But as someone who has participated in many mock trial tournaments,
including the National (College) Tournament, the board's decision seems like
the best thing. Teams travel from around the country to attend the
tournament. The fund-raising that is required to attend is a massive
undertaking - as
Re: Madison's Remonstrance
Isn't that the distinction?
Let's go back to the hypothetical from earlier, the one about the "anti
homosexual" sign versus the "Christians welcome" sign. I thought that was a
strong hypothetical that really hit to the heart of the issue. Why can the
government do A b
