To you only at this point, given my memory (which may be mistaken) that you
previously castigated the opinion in Locke for avoiding the "little Blaine
Amendment" problem, relegating all mention to a footnote. The "long history"
in Missouri that the 8th majority finds so compelling dates to 1870
Apologies to the list. Took a break from grading first summer session first
exam and sent replies intended for individuals to the whole list by mistake.
My bad.
Mark Killenbeck
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe,
On the science, see the Sharon Begley piece in Reuters, "U.S. top court cases
highlights unsettled science in contraception," noted by Howard Bashman in How
Appealing:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/us-usa-court-contraception-analysis-idUSBREA2A07720140311
From: religionlaw-boun...
