Would another way to put it be that, while the government may never question
the theological claim that the religious petitioner considers himself/herself
to be burdened, at some point the connection becomes so attenuated that the
courts will not, as a legal matter, regard the burden involved
Chip,
I was able to access the document. The proposed rule is open for comments,
which must be submitted by October 21.
Richard
Richard T. Foltin, Esq.
Director of National and Legislative Affairs
Office of Government and International Affairs
Washington, DC
P: (202) 785-5463, F: (202)
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:AndroidEmail
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:c9fafb38-77b1-4e73-ac29-684411eed353
DTSTAMP:20131208T001712Z
DTSTART:20131208T003000Z
DTEND:20131208T013000Z
SUMMARY:RE: The clergy-penitent privilege and burdens on third parties
DESCRIPTION:When: 7:30pm â 8:30pm\,
Apologies to all for the invitation that my (not-so-)Smartphone somehow just
sent to the listserve for a non-existent event.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
Levinson, Sanford V slevin...@law.utexas.edu wrote:
I am certainly drawn to be protective of religious acts “essential to
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:CANCEL
PRODID:AndroidEmail
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:c9fafb38-77b1-4e73-ac29-684411eed353
DTSTAMP:20131208T003217Z
DTSTART:20131208T003000Z
DTEND:20131208T013000Z
SUMMARY:RE: The clergy-penitent privilege and burdens on third parties
DESCRIPTION:When: 7:30pm â 8:30pm\,
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Marc DeGirolami
marc.degirol...@stjohns.edumailto:marc.degirol...@stjohns.edu wrote:
I hope you will indulge a brief note about the recent publication of my book,
The Tragedy of Religious
The religious status quo could also be a non-observant or explicitly atheistic
or agnostic household, which would also have to be respected under the rule
that Eugene supports. The alternative is for the courts to determine which
religions are extremist, a questionable role for the judiciary.
Application of freedom of association aside, for a church, there's now
Hosanna-Tabor. The religious autonomy interest that precludes the state from
ever telling a church whom its minister shall be could well extent to their
right to decide who their members are.
Richard
From: Marci Hamilton
I
concur.
The reference to "ZOG" evokes a view of Jewish conspiracy and influence
that is simply a more current version ofthe "history" recited in the
fraudulent Protocols of the Elders of Zion -- and has no more place in civil
discourse.
Richard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Tangentially apropos of the interesting but assuredly academic discussion of
Governor Blanco's call for prayer, here is an e-mail I received this
afternoon detailing the very real -- and mind-boggling -- implications of
the catastrophe for area lawyers, judges and the legal system.
Richard Foltin
Dear friends,
I am pleased to enclose for your information a copy of my article on Title
VII and religious discrimination, co-authored with Seventh-day Adventist
legislative director James Standish, which has just been published in Human
Rights magazine. It appears below as embedded text, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
