was expressed within the school’s pedagogic
purpose. Here, the speech may not be speech and is connected to the pedagogical
purpose more tenuously.
Of course, as a non-lawyer, I think that what the school has done is dumb,
mostly.
Richard James
and that therefore the school is engaged in 'viewpoint
discrimination' of the
kind identified in Peck.
Richard James
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi
