ictional limitation on
> that. *Arbaugh* also talks for a bit about the problem of “drive-by
> jurisdictional rulings”—the bad habit of courts saying that something is
> barred for lack of jurisdiction when they really just mean that there’s no
> valid claim on the merits—which may be
they are employers?
> Because they are religious?) or to all whose rights-exercise might cause
> “harm”?
>
>
>
> ___
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
they are religious?) or to all whose rights-exercise might cause
> “harm”?
>
>
>
> ___
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cg
tions, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list
du/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forw
the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
> ___
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, u
ilman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (right
