RE: UW Service requirement

Isn't this situation analogous to Rust? The government "subsidizes" the speech it prefers, in Rust by paying the speaker only to convey its approved messages, here by awarding academic credit only for its approved activities. Whether it's right or wrong to consider religious service community ser

RE: Lesser protection for religious advocacy

debatable. Does Tinker say that schools can only limit speech so inciteful that it threatens a breach of the peace? If so, how is the school different from a public street? Robin Charlow Hofstra University School of Law Hempstead, New York 11549 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (516) 463-5166

RE: Pamphlets at School

inside the classroom as in the street? Robin Charlow Hofstra University School of Law Hempstead, New York 11549 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (516) 463-5166 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/05/04 12:09 PM >>> I think we ought to be careful in First Amendment cases -- even those arising in

Re: Pamphlets at School

rights of other students. Robin Charlow Hofstra University School of Law Hempstead, New York 11549 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (516) 463-5166 >>> "Gene Summerlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/05/04 11:43 AM >>> While the school could potentially eliminate the distr

Re: Religion Clauses question

ts religion? Not that we have to accept his view, but I doubt this is what Scalia meant in Smith when he spoke of laws targeting religion. Robin Charlow Hofstra University School of Law Hempstead, New York 11549 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (516) 463-5166 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/1/

RE: "Under God"

y and it's flag says or implies anything about any other allegiances one may have, whether or not they are of overriding significance. The words of the Pledge (without "under God") are a statement about one thing, and they contain no reference or allusion to other, related things. R