But he didn't need an EO to instruct his Secretaries.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 4, 2017, at 2:50 PM, Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c)
> wrote:
Agreed. There is nothing of substance here. Maybe more from the agencies down
the road.
Douglas Laycock
I presume there would have to be actual government action against the
congregation first and then a RFRA defense would be appropriate..like the wash
D.C. case where it worked to maintain a feeding program.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2017, at 7:54 AM,
Paul and Mark's posts raise fascinating historical insights. As some of you
know, I have been working on a book for a while on the use of religion in
American elections, so any interesting historical examples you come across like
this, I would greatly appreciate being sent .
But as to the
Just FY (forgive me if I missed an earlier reference)I believe there is
such a bill in Wisconsin as well ?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 2, 2013, at 10:18 AM, hamilto...@aol.commailto:hamilto...@aol.com
hamilto...@aol.commailto:hamilto...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks, Doug. The letter in support
And you'll be relieved to know that it was only a coincidence that seminary
applications sky-rocketed beginning around 67.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 2, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Marc Stern
ste...@ajc.orgmailto:ste...@ajc.org wrote:
There was also an exemption for divinity students.
From:
Is this exemption constitutional after Kiryas Joel?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.edu wrote:
Still on the books today, after the 2013 same-sex marriage legislation.
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:03:04 + (UTC)
Len campquest...@comcast.net
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Marci Hamilton
hamilto...@aol.commailto:hamilto...@aol.com wrote:
I think it is critically important to remember that RLPA was rejected
categorically by the members as much too broad. The history w respect to
anything other than land use and
No prob
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 8, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Marty Lederman
lederman.ma...@gmail.commailto:lederman.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry about that -- wrong address!
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Marty Lederman
lederman.ma...@gmail.commailto:lederman.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a
H.. Take off for the Jewish Sabbath and see what you miss - even on the
religion law listserve. Must be a good lawsuit in this somewhere, but I leave
it to Stern to figure out :)
Just an historical footnote Alan: The Puritans observed the Sabbath from
sundown Saturday until sundown
Impressive...as always
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Ira Lupu
icl...@law.gwu.edumailto:icl...@law.gwu.edu wrote:
The student organizers (from the GW chapter of the J. Reuben Clark Law
Society), Bob Tuttle, and I want to call your attention to the details of this
year's
Marty,
Are you suggesting there is no religious tenet component to the title Vii
exemption? It is just on religious identity? And if a tenet component? How does
it apply to this question?
David
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Marty Lederman
Alan is factually right about his perception.
The polls have consistently shown that if you phrase a question about gay
marriage with a religious liberty guarantee protecting churches the pro-gay
marriage cohort jumps by 14% (from 29-43% of those polled). Most come from the
33% of support
Or folks can urge the Obama Education Department to update and reissue the
religious guidelines that for several years the Clinton administration sent out
widely across the country - guidelines based on the consensus views of a
coalition representing a broad range of viewpoints on church-state
One could argue that this is a classic example of the post hoc ergo propter hoc
fallacy, if of course, one were inclined to make such arguments.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:09 PM
To:
Not been a good week for Chabad. First, after one of its prominent
rabbis in Israeli calls for Prime Minister Olmert and other leading
politicians supporting a piece process to be lynched, there are calls to
end its special status as a provider of religious services within the
army and other
forget the specifics of this for a moment. I want to address whether religion
can ever be a factor of consideration for a court. If it would be appropriate,
as courts do regularly to take into consideration consistency in a child's life
in determining a child's best interest, why not
Amen
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W. A. Wildhack
III
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 2:43 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Recent Threads / True Mental Health...
I would assume that the area of EC issues that is most tempting to think
of in terms of compelling interest has to do with government
expenditures not speech. If e.g. studies actually showed that religious
based substance treatment programs were decisively more effective than
non-religious
Kevin,
Eugene and Ed offer good answers. I would suggest another that I think
is even more pervasive and politically explosive.
Under the Civil Rights Act, the religious exemption for hiring is
significantly in play. To what degree and under what circumstances can
religious groups
Because of the Sabbath and Yom Kippur, I am just catching up with the
threads of the past few days. I wanted to add a note to the discussion
about the Muslim taxi drivers. There was a lot flying and I can't find
the original posting describing exactly the system of color coded cabs,
so forgive me
Bit of a strange posting for this listserv.
In any case, you might try being in touch with
Aaron Levine at Yeshiva University, Economics Department, who has written
extensively in English on related subjects ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). (His books will provide a basic primer.) He will certainly
I remain confused as to the facts.
Did they actually try to exclude people based on religious identity? I
assume that would be a clear violation of the NY law. It just isn't
clear to me why a Christian skating night open to everyone violates
the law as it is worded. If they wanted to hold a
22 matches
Mail list logo