I had thought that, where constitutional accommodations are
involved, Thomas v. Review Bd. had settled the matter: It's not up to
the government to decide whether beliefs are internally consistent, or
whether they are shared by all of the claimant's ostensible
coreligionists. Nor is it
Nor do I and nor did I so claim.
On 9/30/06, Volokh, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had thought that, where constitutional accommodations are
involved, Thomas v. Review Bd. had settled the matter: It's not up to
the government to decide whether beliefs are internally consistent, or
