The videos of our conference are now posted, on a site where we have also posted many of the most important resources (opinions, briefs, the Rule, articles, blogposts, etc.) related to the debate. Hope you find it useful. Please let me know if you have any reactions or suggestions of sources to add to the page:
http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/resources-and-background-on-contraception-and-conscience Thanks, Marty On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Marty Lederman <lederman.ma...@gmail.com>wrote: > Please excuse the plug. I hope this is something that those of you in the > D.C, environs and beyond might be interested in attending. Thanks > > > *Contraception and Conscience: A Symposium on Religious Liberty, > Women’s Health, and the HHS Rule on Provision of Birth Control Coverage for > Employees * > > > > > Georgetown University Law Center > McDonough Hall > Philip A. Hart Auditorium > 600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. > Washington, DC > > Friday, September 21, 2012 > 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. > > > > A conference examining the legal, theological, health, equality, and > ethical issues relating to the recent Rule promulgated by the U.S. > Department of Health and Human Services on “Coverage of Preventive Services > Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.” > > The symposium brings together legal, religious, and cultural scholars and > practitioners for a day-long conversation about the increasingly > contentious public debate surrounding the HHS Rule requiring employers to > subsidize preventive health services for employees, the religious > accommodations in the HHS rule, and the lawsuits filed by religious > objectors challenging the rule. > > > *Continental Breakfast—8:30-9:00 > * > *Introduction—9:00-9:10 > *Dean William M. Treanor, Georgetown University Law Center > * > Panel One – 9:10-10:45 > * > > *The Legal Challenges to the HHS Contraception Rule*. What is the nature > of the HHS Rule and its religious accommodations? What is the status of > the more than two dozen lawsuits challenging the HHS Rule? How are the > courts likely to resolve the statutory and constitutional issues? How do > claims of religious conscience apply to institutional employers, including > for-profit employers? What are the relevant state interests—should the > Rule be viewed as simply about enabling access to preventive health care, > or also about ensuring equality in the workplace? How do these cases > reflect broader trends in the development of the law of religious liberty? > How should HHS frame its promised additional religious accommodation? > > *Panelists > *Martin Lederman, Georgetown University Law Center > Louise Melling, American Civil Liberties Union > Melissa Rogers,Wake Forest University Divinity School, Center for Religion > and Public Affairs > Robert Vischer, University of St. Thomas School of Law > Lori Windham, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty > > > *Panel Two – 11:00-12:45 * > > > *What is the Burden on Religious Exercise*? Does the HHS Rule put > religious employers to an untenable choice between obeying the law and > honoring religious obligations, and if so, how? Does it require > individuals or entities to “cooperate with evil” in a manner that their > faith forbids? Does compliance with the law prevent them from “bearing > witness” to their faith or create “scandal” by conveying endorsement of > activities to which the employer morally objects? > > *Panelists > *Lisa Sowle Cahill, Boston College > Patrick Deneen, University of Notre Dame > Cathleen Kaveny, University of Notre Dame > Michael Kessler, Georgetown University > John Langan, S.J., Georgetown University > Robert Tuttle, George Washington University School of Law > > > *Panel Three – 2:15-4:00 * > > > *A Broader Focus*. How and why did this particular issue engender such > concern and controversy? What are the historical antecedents? What does > it tell us about how religious communities and institutions (especially > those involved in provision of education and social services) can and > should navigate rapidly changing norms in the public square? What are the > implications of this debate for preventive health services? For women’s > equality in the workplace and elsewhere in public life? What are the > ethical implications for physicians and other health-care providers? > > *Panelists > *Gregg Bloche, Georgetown University Law Center > Tracy Fessenden, Arizona State University > Eduardo Peñalver, Cornell University Law School > Robin West, Georgetown University Law Center > Robin Fretwell Wilson, Washington & Lee University School of Law > > > *Please RSVP by September 19 to rs...@law.georgetown.edu > * > > The conference is co-sponsored by the Georgetown University Law Center and > the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at Georgetown > University. It is made possible through a grant from the Ford Foundation. > >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
