-Original Message-
From: Ira (Chip) Lupu [mailto:icl...@law.gwu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:19 PM
To: Volokh, Eugene
Subject: Elane Photography
Eugene:
I'm at a computer from which I cannot post to the list. But here's one
question about your compelling interest argumen
The state's pervasive discrimination against same-sex relationships makes
mincemeat of its claim that it has a compelling interest in prohibiting all
private discrimination against same-sex relationships.
Quoting "Volokh, Eugene" :
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ira (Chip) Lupu [mailt
What if it were not a wedding ceremony (legally recognized or not)? But a
Valentine's Day party or a New Year's Eve Party that the gay couple wanted
memorialized? Or the couple's child's birthday party or bar mitzva?
Could the photographer then refuse? On what grounds?
This is pure status dis
true. but why is compelling state interest the standard here?
I don't think SCt 1st amendment jurisprudence in cutting edge cases is
coherent such that we can be confident of anything. that is, mushy
principles will be trotted out to resolve it, not hard-edged rules and
existing standards of rev
eligionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:35 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: FW from Chip Lupu: Elane Photography
What if it were not a wedding ceremony (legally recognized or not)? But a
Valentine's Day party o
Because the New Mexico RFRA says so.
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:38 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: FW from Chip Lupu: Elane Photogr
cla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Steven Jamar
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:38 PM
>
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: FW from Chip Lupu: Elane Photography
>
>
>
> true. but why is compelling sta
rom: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:35 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: FW from Chip Lupu: Elane Photography
What if it were not a wedding ceremony (legally
interest is so compelling.
Eugene
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Tushnet
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:57 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics; Law & Religion issues for Law
Academics
Subject: RE: FW from
