hreat in
America for political and constitutional reasons.
-Roger Severino
> From: icl...@law.gwu.edu
> Subject: RE: Impact of same-sex marriage rulings on strict
> scrutinyinreligious exemption cases
> To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:55:
In a message dated 4/10/09 6:42:05 AM, rseveri...@hotmail.com writes:
> Art, I'm curious to know why you "certainly wouldn't suggest that the
> state should withdraw the power to solemnize civil marriages."
>
I think the list discussion has probably overtaken this, but my reason (as
I suggeste
opposition to the extension of same-sex marriage (no more Prop
> 8's).
>
> Is there a political deal that can be struck here? (I could support
> it.) Or is all this just a one-way demand for respect?
>
> ---- Original message
>> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:40:07
age
>Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:40:07 -0400
>From: Roger Severino
>Subject: RE: Impact of same-sex marriage rulings on strict scrutinyinreligious
>exemption cases
>To:
>
> Art, it sounds like you think houses of worship will
> retain their power to solemnize civi
no
From: artspit...@aol.com
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:55:28 -0400
Subject: Re: Impact of same-sex marriage rulings on strict scrutinyinreligious
exemption cases
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Roger Severino asks why I think states won't withdraw the power to solemnize
civil marriages from chu
-Roger Severino
From: steve...@umich.edu
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Impact of same-sex marriage rulings on strict scrutinyinreligious
exemption cases
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:06:04 -0700
The protected sphere for religion should involve that
which is actually religious.
r='261564
> Weblog: http://www.mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice
>
> ------------
>
>
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Sand
.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Severino
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 9:28 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Impact of same-sex marriage rulings on strict scrutinyinreligious
exemption cases
Art, I am curious to know why you think same-sex marria
les
are bent in order to conform to religious doctrines.
Steve Sanders
_
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Severino
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 9:28 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Impact of
