Marci -
Just 4 hours ago, I thought you agreed that "If it's 5 to 10 minutes
[delay], and the system does not have to bear additional cost of hiring
additional drivers to accommodate this one, it seems like a good
accommodation." Now you say that accommodation is "inappropriate in certain
circums
Amen, Mark, on the God help us part. We differ on what is needed to get
along. You think apparently that believers should have the world around
them shaped to their beliefs. I believe that oftentimes believers must adjust
to the world around them.
The law against polygamy was a good
Eugene -- I was agreeing with you, I believe. I wasn't describing Title
VII law, but rather what it should be. It should recognize the principle
that accommodation is unnecessary and even inappropriate in certain
circumstances, and one of them is transportation. Right now, the secular
es customers to say, when they make the
call, where they're going), I don't see how secular courts can reject the Title
VII claim on "none of your business" grounds.
Eugene
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf O
Law Academics
Subject: Re: Bus Driver and Women's Interests/ Was Settlement or extortion?
Yes, and if we allow one conscientious objector to be excused from the draft,
pretty soon we won't be able to get anyone to serve in the Army.
Your crystal ball was manufactured at a different fac
: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:57 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Bus Driver and Women's Interests/ Was Settlement or extortion?
Mark-- Thank you very much for your thoughtful response. I do respect your
position and understand that it is shared by others.
As I suppose is no sur
Yes, and if we allow one conscientious objector to be excused from the
draft, pretty soon we won't be able to get anyone to serve in the Army.
Your crystal ball was manufactured at a different factory from mine. TWA v.
Hardison was decided 34 years ago, and we have not yet achieved Balkanization.
If it's 5 to 10 minutes, and the system does not have to bear additional
cost of hiring additional drivers to accommodate this one, it seems like a
good accommodation. But it will only work if you have only a small number
of drivers who need accommodation, and I don't think you can keep t
So, Marci, do you think it does harm to the women who want to go to Planned
Parenthood, or harm to the public interest, if the women have to wait an
extra 5 or 10 minutes for driver #2 to pick them up? I'm not asking about 2
or 3 hours.
Art
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
> Thanks t
Thanks to Paul for his thoughtful response to my longer post from this
morning. I'm not sure we are on different pages given his example below.
For those who have not read my work, I have frequently said that
accommodation that does not harm others is appropriate and desirable. I have
g attorneys' fees to the plaintiff, a settlement or extortion?
Surely calling it one or the other is really just a way of expressing our views
about the substance of the law.
Paul HorwitzUniversity of Alabama
From: hamilto...@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:56:42 -0400
Su
Mark-- Thank you very much for your thoughtful response. I do respect
your position and understand that it is shared by others.
As I suppose is no surprise to anyone on this list, I take a different
view. I think the two men are identically situated, because they are both
intent on im
12 matches
Mail list logo
