RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-13 Thread Eric Rassbach
ric > > > > > From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] > On Behalf Of Marc Stern [ste...@ajc.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:30 PM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subj

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-13 Thread Scarberry, Mark
s for Law Academics Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge So I take it we are in agreement that some people have sincere humane objections to kosher/halal slaughter methods. Where we disagree (and what you are offended by) is my statement that many p

Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-13 Thread Ira Lupu
com/2007/02/british-parents-protest-halal-menus-in.html > > > Howard Friedman > > > -Original Message- > From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Volokh, Eugene > Sent: Wed 4/11/2012 7:46 PM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subje

Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-13 Thread Claudia Haupt
2, 2012 3:18 PM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against > EstablishmentClausechallenge > > Nick Kristoff has an interesting piece in today’s NYTimes, > http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/12/opinion/kristof-is-a

Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-13 Thread Marci Hamilton
__ > From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] > On Behalf Of Marc Stern [ste...@ajc.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:30 PM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy ag

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-13 Thread Eric Rassbach
, April 12, 2012 3:18 PM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge Nick Kristoff has an interesting piece in today’s NYTimes, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/12/opinion/kristof-is-an-egg-for-breakfast-w

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Marc Stern
, 2012 01:25 To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject: Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge Chip is right, of course. But Eric's point requires a response. I don't I don't think PETA folks would appreciate having their sincere concerns a

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Eric Rassbach
gion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge Except that PETA itself has in the past referred to the way commercial farm animals are raised as rep[licating conditions in concentration camps. Marc From: religionlaw-bou

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Sanford Levinson
rom: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Claudia Haupt Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:43 PM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge I wrote about th

Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Steven Jamar
paths. > > Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless > > > -Original message- > From: "Friedman, Howard M." > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Sent: Thu, Apr 12, 2012 03:10:57 GMT+00:00 > Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy agai

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Eric Rassbach
ligionclause.blogspot.com/2007/02/british-parents-protest-halal-menus-in.html Howard Friedman -Original Message- From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu> on behalf of Volokh, Eugene Sent: Wed 4/11/2012 7:46 PM To: Law & Religion issues for

Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread hamilton02
l Message- From: Eric Rassbach To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Sent: Thu, Apr 12, 2012 1:14 pm Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge Chip is right that the supposedly inhumane methods of kosher/halal slaughter (something

Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Claudia Haupt
chool of Law > Yeshiva University > 55 Fifth Avenue > New York, NY 10003 > (212) 790-0215 > hamilto...@aol.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Eric Rassbach > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Sent: Thu, Apr 12, 2012 1:14 pm > Subject

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Finkelman, Paul
3:10:57 GMT+00:00 Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge It is interesting to compare reactions in Europe to similar situations. In 2010, French politicians strongly criticized a restaurant chain that decided to serve only halal meat in 8 of its re

Re: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Marie A. Failinger
2/british-parents-protest-halal-menus-in.html Howard Friedman -Original Message- From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Volokh, Eugene Sent: Wed 4/11/2012 7:46 PM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against Establishmen

RE: Court upholds prison no-pork policy against EstablishmentClause challenge

2012-04-12 Thread Friedman, Howard M.
nclause.blogspot.com/2007/02/british-parents-protest-halal-menus-in.html Howard Friedman -Original Message- From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Volokh, Eugene Sent: Wed 4/11/2012 7:46 PM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Court upholds