ent: Monday, August 27, 2012 11:36 PM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: New circumcision policy statement from the AAP
>
>
> Eugene --
>
> I have to respectfully continue to disagree with your approach to this issue,
> as well as your assessment of
__
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene [vol...@law.ucla.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:48 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New circumcision policy statement f
un...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
on behalf of Volokh, Eugene [vol...@law.ucla.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 10:01 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New circumcision policy statement from the AAP
The question is why, in
Behalf Of Walsh, Kevin
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 5:35 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: New circumcision policy statement from the AAP
With appreciation to Eric and especially to Eugene for pushing us to think
ca
With appreciation to Eric and especially to Eugene for pushing us to think
carefully about the right legal rule regarding circumcision, I wonder if
focusing on even more fundamental considerations can clarify even more.
As I see it, "we" do not "delegate" the authority to parents to make decisio
I don't think it changes my analysis, since I've all along
acknowledged that there are plausible medical arguments in favor of
circumcision. I'm hesitant to treat the AAP statement as materially changing
that, since I take it that there's some disagreement among pediatric groups -
