To: Marci Hamilton; Law & Religion issues for
LawAcademics
Subject: RE: Religious exemptions and undue preference for religion/Smith
Do you mean that Smith as symbol has been important to child and disabled adult
victims of church sexual abuse? I guess I have two questions about this
ative one? 2) I take it
you're not saying that Smith as substance has been vital to those movements.
I'm not sure I see how that statement would be accurate.
Paul HorwitzUniversity of Alabama School of Law
> To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> Subject: Re: Religious exemptions and
Perry-- with respect to your last comment about Smith and Boerne, could you
please point to illegal religious practices that you would want the free
exercise clause to protect that are not protected under Smith? I am interested
in the actual impact of Smith. I can tell you that Smith has been
