:35 AM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: Rights of corporations and RFRAs
>
> I think that's right, partly because the burden on stockholders of
> selling shares in a publicly traded corporation is much less than the
> burden of selling sh
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:35 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Rights of corporations and RFRAs
I think that's right, partly because the burden on sto
a.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Brownstein
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:50 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Rights of corporations and RFRAs
I think there is considerable force to Eugene's argument about closely held
corporations
I think there is considerable force to Eugene's argument about closely held
corporations (although I'm not sure if the size of the enterprise needs to be
taken into account too -- I'm still thinking about that.) Do I take it from
your argument that you believe a publicly traded corporation would
