Title: Message
Seems to me hard to see how a university can
give "community service" credit for student speech advocating controversial
political viewpoints (presumably viewpoints of the student's own choice), but
deny credit for student speech advocating controversial religious
I recall that in the briefing of the Lamb's Chapel case, the State of New York argued that religious uses of school facilities did not come within a catch-all provision of "other uses of benefit to the community." The State pressed the point this way:
"Thecommunity-service/private-interest
ut that). But surely there
should be at least that protection.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steven JamarSent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004
2:06 PMTo: Law Religion issues for Law
AcademicsSubject: Re: UW Service requ
, November 10, 2004 2:06 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: UW Service requirement
Comes back to the disagreement mentioned by someone else earlier --
religion is a special case in all respects. Non-discrimination is not
sufficient.
On Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at 04:06
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UW Service requirement
Isn't this situation analogous to Rust? The government
subsidizes the speech it prefers, in Rust by paying the
speaker only to convey its approved messages, here by
awarding academic credit only for its approved activities
