I find it very disturbing that Laycock, et. al. basically acted as cheer
leaders for a bill they knew was controversial, to say the least, among
their fellow scholars. The "analysis" proffered to the legislature did not
mention the potential non-discrimination hazards at all - that issue was
compl
I do not find it all disturbing that academics engage in advocacy and do not
present their positions in an objective, neutral way — or in a way that some
others might think objectivity and neutrality require. Nor do I object to
their being advocates, tailoring arguments to the particular audien
