Apologies in advance if someone has already made this connection:
If I'm understanding it correctly, the effect of the Arizona bill would be
to establish or confirm that the Arizona RFRA *does exactly what Hobby
Lobby and its amici are arguing the federal RFRA already does* -- namely,
extend
Yeshiva University
55 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
(212) 790-0215
http://sol-reform.com
-Original Message-
From: Marty Lederman lederman.ma...@gmail.com
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Wed, Feb 26, 2014 3:35 pm
Subject: The Arizona bill
Pepperdine Univ. School of Law
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of hamilto...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:48 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: The Arizona bill and Hobby Lobby
The difference
: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of hamilto...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:48 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: The Arizona bill and Hobby Lobby
The difference is that in the Hobby Lobby cases, the Defendant
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: The Arizona bill and Hobby Lobby
The difference is that in the Hobby Lobby cases, the Defendant is the
government. In the AZ cases, both parties would be private, with the
business being able to raise RFRA against
the private actor.
Marci
