Footnote 2 of the government's brief appears to disclaim, and rebut, the
view that large employers are free to drop health insurance and pay the
taxes.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA
I don't read it to say anything of the sort: Footnote 2 is about what can
happen if an employer *that* *sponsors a plan* fails to include required
coverage.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Douglas Laycock dlayc...@virginia.eduwrote:
Footnote 2 of the government’s brief appears to disclaim,
Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 12:13 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The government's brief
I don't read it to say anything of the sort: Footnote 2 is about what can
happen if an employer that sponsors a plan fails to include required
coverage
Indeed, just one week ago, in its *Little Sisters *brief, the government
told the Court this:
The preventive-services coverage provision in general, and the
contraceptive-coverage provision in particular, apply only if an employer
offers a group health plan. Employers, however, are not required
: Marty Lederman
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 12:20 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Reply To: Marty Lederman
Subject: Re: The government's brief
Indeed, just one week ago, in its Little Sisters brief, the government told the
Court this:
The preventive-services coverage provision
: The government's brief
Indeed, just one week ago, in its *Little Sisters *brief, the government
told the Court this:
The preventive-services coverage provision in general, and the
contraceptive-coverage provision in particular, apply only if an employer
offers a group health plan. Employers
