Ken Arck wrote:
> At 04:55 PM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
>
>> It is a noticeable loss when the leaves come out. I've pretty much noticed
>> that a fairly noisy signal with no leaves becomes unreadable when the leaves
>> are full. My opinion would be additional antenna height could be helpful
>> since th
W5VAY
- Original Message -
From: Ken Arck
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Additional Loss From Trees
At 04:55 PM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
>It is a noticeable loss when the leaves come out. I'v
At 04:55 PM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
>It is a noticeable loss when the leaves come out. I've pretty much noticed
>that a fairly noisy signal with no leaves becomes unreadable when the leaves
>are full. My opinion would be additional antenna height could be helpful
>since there would be less density to
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: "Laryn Lohman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:34 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Additional Loss From Trees
>I know I have seen figures for this , but can't remember...
>
> I'm studying th
I know I have seen figures for this , but can't remember...
I'm studying the coverage on a system here that we just put up on
70cm. There are no leaves on the trees now. Much of our needed
coverage area is in wooded areas with 60-90ft. trees (maple, oak)
right up to the road. Approximately how
5 matches
Mail list logo
