RE: [Repeater-Builder] Another frequency grab.

Well, I've submitted my remarks in opposition to the FCC... If anyone is interested, I can either post them to the list or to the group's files area, or send them direct (in private). Time will tell... Mark - N9WYS -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Another frequency grab.

Since hospitials have the radiology departments 'hardend' with radiation proof walls why not force the RFID examinations be conducted in RF tight rooms i.e. faraday shielding. This would be a two way street, less RF from the outside world to interfere with the scan and the scan would not penetrate

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Another frequency grab.

I fear that it would be fruitless to fight this one too, there isnt a politician out there that would not side with those who want to do things to make medicine safer and more efficient. The question is though, when there is a medical side to it, Ham cant be where it could interfere with life a

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Another frequency grab.

I know that inadvertent contact with RF energy can cause burns... Maybe we need to send the FCC their own document regarding these hazards http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/ oet56e4.pdf I'm not in the trade, so I have no real idea of how to compute expo

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Another frequency grab.

At 12:04 PM 2007-11-16 -0800, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote: While the hams only use the top and bottom megahertz of the 900mhz band, and we are secondary there, I think we all might be interested in this waiver request of Part 15 rules for the 902-928 band. <

[Repeater-Builder] Another frequency grab.

While the hams only use the top and bottom megahertz of the 900mhz band, and we are secondary there, I think we all might be interested in this waiver request of Part 15 rules for the 902-928 band. What's wrong with a pencil and