Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
March 23, 2009
DA 09-657
Mr. Gary R. Mitchell
President, Northern California Packet Association
P.O. Box K
Sunnyvale, CA 94087
Re: Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed December 5, 2007
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
This is in response to the petit
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Eric Lemmon wrote:
> Perhaps it would serve the public interest better if the actual
> document were presented, rather than a copy of the text. See the
> attached.
> 5 The Commission revised the definition in order to clarify that
> certain accommodations for message forw
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater never decodes the voice, it just bit regenerates the
signal back to the data stream. Yet it is a repeater for sure per the
FCC. I would say a linear transponder or translator is a repeater also.
the transmit part is active while the receive part is picking up the
signal.
groups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater never decodes the voice, it just bit regenerates the
signal back to the data stream. Yet it is a repeater for sure per the
FC
peater for every 1.2 users.
I know, I know... ;^)
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: Tom Azlin, N4ZPT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
At 16:34 3/24/2009, Jeff Condit wrote:
>What do you call it when messages are recorded and then
>retransmission begins right after reception ends? By this
>definition it would not constitute a "simplex repeater", right?
That is exactly m y understanding of what "simplex repeater" means
>Je
Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:02AM
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on
Repeater Definition <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yah
March 25, 2009 7:28:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
If it transmits and receives on the SAME frequency (SIMPLEX).
David
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Condit wrote:
What do you call it when messages are recorded and
Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on
Repeater Definition (mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com)
(mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com)
(mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com)
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater never decodes the voice, it just bitregenerates the
sig
Jeff Condit wrote:
> What do you call it when messages are recorded and then
> retransmission begins right after reception ends? By this definition
> it would not constitute a "simplex repeater", right?
>
> Jeff Condit
I don't remember ever seeing 'simplex repeater' defined. I would expect
tha
Just because you call something a repeater doesn't mean it is.
A "simplex repeater" is not a repeater due to two things: 1. It does not
simultaneously retransmit, and 2. It transmits on the same frequency.
Point #1 was just clarified by the FCC Monday, but point #2 has never
been misinterpreted
vey the end result of the
operation.
Milt
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Gomberg"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
> At 16:34 3/24/2009, Jeff Condit wrote:
>>What d
after reception ends? By this definition
> it would not constitute a "simplex repeater", right?
>
> Jeff Condit
>
> - Original Message - From: Tom Azlin, N4ZPT To:
> Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:02
> AM Subject: Re: [Repe
13 matches
Mail list logo
