:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all
> repeaters as repeaters
>
> [snip]
> >
> > You
- Original Message -
From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all
repeaters as repeaters
[snip]
>
> You're right-the definition is pretty loose. Some
At 9/21/2007 07:02, you wrote:
>Bob Dengler wrote:
>
> > Kenwood SkyCommand. 100s of "remote bases" in SoCal. I won't speak for
> > other areas, since I'm not familiar with what operators in those areas
> > consider their systems to be. Here, they're "auxiliary stations". Don't
> > believe me?
Each member has a proportional number of votes consistent with the
number of licensed hams that live in their area. So, one member may have
1 vote who is in the middle of nowhere compared with someone in a
populated area having 12 votes.
Hard to understand? Look at the Electoral College. Someone c
Bob Dengler wrote:
> Kenwood SkyCommand. 100s of "remote bases" in SoCal. I won't speak for
> other areas, since I'm not familiar with what operators in those areas
> consider their systems to be. Here, they're "auxiliary stations". Don't
> believe me? Consider that back in the early 70's
Larry wrote:
> Not being familiar with the NFCC Voting system ... I'm looking for
> enlightenment.
>
> (Snip)
>
> Under the NFCC's proportional voting system, 93 votes were cast in favor
> of
> the motion by 19 members, and 54 against by 11 members.
>
> (Snip)
>
> Please explain ... 147 votes b
Nate Duehr wrote:
> Mathematics shows that in cases where some stations can hear others,
> whereas a third station (or fourth, fifth, sixth) can only hear one of
> the original two stations, there's a cap on effective channel throughput
> as eventually the channel (in the worst-case scenario) b
Chris Rosing wrote:
> Ok, For someone who isnt that much into the rules and regsthat
> would seem like a duh statement. Why is this such a big deal? To
> me, a repeater repeats the signal, hince a repeater. Looking at it,
> I am seeing that you refer to delays and transmission
> protocol...
Not being familiar with the NFCC Voting system ... I'm looking for
enlightenment.
(Snip)
Under the NFCC's proportional voting system, 93 votes were cast in favor
of
the motion by 19 members, and 54 against by 11 members.
(Snip)
Please explain ... 147 votes by 30 people..?? (Sounds like a Polit
Which proposal is that?
Joe M.
> George Henry wrote:
>
> That pretty much puts the final nail in the coffin of TASMA's
> proposal
At 03:51 PM 09/20/07, you wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Chris Rosing wrote:
> > What other things out there "repeat" but arent repeaters?
>
>Digipeaters. Since no one ever made a full-duplex digipeater...
>--
>Kris Kirby, KE4AHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>* WAR IS PEACE * FREEDOM IS SLAVERY *
>* IGNORAN
That pretty much puts the final nail in the coffin of TASMA's proposal
Kris Kirby wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Chris Rosing wrote:
>> What other things out there "repeat" but arent repeaters?
>
> Digipeaters. Since no one ever made a full-duplex digipeater...
Huh? Sure they did. Our club did it in the late 80's and early 90's
when regular AX.25 packet radio was
At 9/20/2007 03:44 PM, you wrote:
>Ok, For someone who isnt that much into the rules and regsthat would
>seem like a duh statement. Why is this such a big deal? To me, a
>repeater repeats the signal, hince a repeater. Looking at it, I am seeing
>that you refer to delays and transmission
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Chris Rosing wrote:
> What other things out there "repeat" but arent repeaters?
Digipeaters. Since no one ever made a full-duplex digipeater...
--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* WAR IS PEACE * FREEDOM IS SLAVERY *
* IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH * KETCHUP IS *
*
CTED];
List for people interested in the D Star repeaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2:35:05 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as
repeaters
-
- Forwarded Message
From: Jay Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:15:49 PM
Subject: NFCC votes to recommend FCC treat all repeaters as repeaters
The membership of the National Frequency Coordinators' Council has voted to
ask the FCC to
17 matches
Mail list logo
