Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 95 - Please no replies....

2007-04-16 Thread Kevin Custer
Paul M Schmitter wrote: Thank you for all the info. Part 95 is not written very clearly. There seem to be many interpretations. In talking with several different officials of the FCC, this is done purposely so the rules can be bent to fit situations. If the rules were cut-n-dry, there would

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Part 95 - Please no replies....

2007-04-16 Thread mch
Are you talking about Part 95 or Part 97? Joe M. Kevin Custer wrote: Paul M Schmitter wrote: Thank you for all the info. Part 95 is not written very clearly. There seem to be many interpretations. In talking with several different officials of the FCC, this is done purposely so the