[Repeater-Builder] Re: follow up on lightening strike last spring response

2010-01-20 Thread dan173mi
Rich, it sounds like an antenna, feedline, or tower/site issue. The easiest way to find out would be a dummy load connected in place of your antenna. Operate into the repeater locally with an ht and listen for any noise. What you're describing is a fairly common problem with repeaters that

[Repeater-Builder] Re: follow up on lightening strike last spring response

2010-01-20 Thread dan173mi
Most duplexers are passive, mechanical devices. You did say the cavities had been visually inspected and cleaned so we can assume the cans themselves are fine. In my opinion the single component on a duplexer that's most likely to fail would be the cable harness and its associated

[Repeater-Builder] RE: follow up on lightening strike last spring response

2010-01-17 Thread Richard
Sorry if I've been late in posting. First, the antenna and hard line is ok. We've tested that part out and its working. We think ( I ) that we got zapped through a unused phone line which is mounted behind the repeater rack. Yes, we have tested the can's using both a IRL (?sp) and a General

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: follow up on lightening strike last spring response

2010-01-17 Thread Jim Lange
could be anywhere. I hate tower rats! Jim WA2RJP - Original Message - From: Richard To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 13:47 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: follow up on lightening strike last spring response Sorry if I've been late

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: follow up on lightening strike last spring response

2010-01-17 Thread K5IN
] RE: follow up on lightening strike last spring response Sorry if I've been late in posting. First, the antenna and hard line is ok. We've tested that part out and its working. We think ( I ) that we got zapped through a unused phone line which is mounted behind the repeater rack. Yes