RE: [Repeater-Builder] RG-142, RG-400 va RG-223

2010-08-15 Thread Eric Lemmon
Lemmon Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 5:20 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] RG-142, RG-400 va RG-223 Sid, RG-223 will be fine, provided that you use silver-plated connectors that are specifically designed for that cable, and avoid using any barrels or

RE: [Repeater-Builder] RG-142, RG-400 va RG-223

2010-08-11 Thread Eric Lemmon
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Sid Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:51 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RG-142, RG-400 va RG-223 I have seen a lot of jumpers, interconning cables, duplexer cables, etc made using RG-142 and RG-400 (the 400 is preferred). However

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RG-142, RG-400 va RG-223

2010-08-11 Thread wd8chl
On 8/11/2010 2:51 PM, Sid wrote: > I have seen a lot of jumpers, interconning cables, duplexer cables, > etc made using RG-142 and RG-400 (the 400 is preferred). However, > RG-223 is also silver, double shielded,very flexible, and also about > RG-58 size. Any reason why RG-223 would not work just

[Repeater-Builder] RG-142, RG-400 va RG-223

2010-08-11 Thread Sid
I have seen a lot of jumpers, interconning cables, duplexer cables, etc made using RG-142 and RG-400 (the 400 is preferred). However, RG-223 is also silver, double shielded,very flexible, and also about RG-58 size. Any reason why RG-223 would not work just as well; other than it is not a teflon