Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-02 Thread Jim B.
Mathew Quaife wrote: This is what makes me believe that the uhf receiver that I have will not handle the high side cut. Actually, I have my doubts about a 450-470 split rx making it down to 434 without some serious work. I know a Micor won't do it. You should use a 403-430 split rx instead.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-02 Thread no6b
At 1/1/2007 19:25, you wrote: My first attempt, since I had the vhf/uhf radio on the bench already, I put the xtal in the 144.810 rx side of the radio, it did not work, I would have thought it should have at least received, even though I would have to retune the radio. I put a second xtal in,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-02 Thread no6b
At 1/2/2007 13:07, you wrote: Mathew Quaife wrote: This is what makes me believe that the uhf receiver that I have will not handle the high side cut. Actually, I have my doubts about a 450-470 split rx making it down to 434 without some serious work. I know a Micor won't do it. You should

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-02 Thread Mathew Quaife
That is what these radio's are. They came from Canada. Mathew Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mathew Quaife wrote: This is what makes me believe that the uhf receiver that I have will not handle the high side cut. Actually, I have my doubts about a 450-470 split rx making

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-02 Thread Mathew Quaife
The radios that I have were from Canada, and was originally on 413 Mhz. So chances are they will not hit the high side, but then also found that the xtal was cut wrong. Mathew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 1/2/2007 13:07, you wrote: Mathew Quaife wrote: This is what makes

RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-01 Thread Mathew Quaife
Well I came to the conclusion that the 440 receiver would not go high enough to make it to the high side of the xtal, so I went back to work on the 144.810 receivers, and boom, came to life. The xtals are good. The low cut xtal would work, but the high side won't on the UHF. Thanks for

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-01 Thread Chuck Kelsey
: Monday, January 01, 2007 5:05 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out Well I came to the conclusion that the 440 receiver would not go high enough to make it to the high side of the xtal, so I went back to work on the 144.810 receivers, and boom, came

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-01 Thread Laryn Lohman
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and boom, came to life. WHAT went boom? What exactly did you do that got your receivers working? Laryn K8TVZ

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-01 Thread Mathew Quaife
My first attempt, since I had the vhf/uhf radio on the bench already, I put the xtal in the 144.810 rx side of the radio, it did not work, I would have thought it should have at least received, even though I would have to retune the radio. I put a second xtal in, and got the same results.

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Bomar Crystals Ordered, Figured it out

2007-01-01 Thread Laryn Lohman
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My first attempt, since I had the vhf/uhf radio on the bench already, I put the xtal in the 144.810 rx side of the radio, it did not work, I would have thought it should have at least received, even though I would