Here we go again !
Mark Holman AB8RU
*** IT Student *
Happy Holidays
- Original Message -
From: "Coy Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:54 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from
pager tr
Sorry, I have NEVER met a Great Tech that could spell any better
than I can. Wait, You're the one flaming yourself about your own
spelling That's posting to your self...The next step after talking
to your self is talking back then posting to your self...?
--- In Repeater-Builder@yaho
--- Coy Hilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everyone knows that most GOOD technical people can't
> spell.
> 73
> AC0Y
Yes, but the GREAT ones are spelling wizards! :)
Have a good Christmas.
Joe
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail ha
I have never...ever claimed to know anything about spelling! I know
a hell of a lot more about radios and computers than spelling! If
that's the worst thing that you can say about me then I'm proud!
Everyone knows that most GOOD technical people can't spell.
73
AC0Y
--- In Repeater-Builder@yah
Very true.
I always inject my repeat audio right back into the mic circuit so it will
have a limiter stage. Also, that is why I always recommend people set their
repeater deviation at 4.5 KHz; to allow a little room for over-shoots.
-- Original Message --
Received: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 07:3
What some repeater owners don't take into
consideration is the accumulated effect of all audio
going out on the transmitter. You may find that
testing with a single tone, or maybe voice peaks, will
give you a good reading. Voice+PL tone+the repeater
voice ID can drive the deviation well beyond 5K
That should also be the max for a 20 Khz bandplan, to allow a little room for
accidental overshoots.
-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:38:25 PM CST
From: mch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SNIP
> factual reasons) that 4.5 kHz should be the maximum in a 15 kHz
> bandplan.
SNIP
Wonderful. We've digressed to flaming yourself. ;->
For the internet communications impaired, that is a JOKE.
Joe M. (the one who can spell) ;->
Joe Montierth wrote:
>
> --- Joe Montierth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > This post is about as relavent as the others.
> >
>
> RELEVANT YOU
--- Joe Montierth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This post is about as relavent as the others.
>
RELEVANT YOU IDIOT!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
Yahoo! G
--- Coy Hilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Come on...someone please say it...Most all radios
> built for FM use on
> commertial and or amature bands are designed for a
> MAXIMUM of +-5Kc
> deviation, period! Most receivers are built for
> +-7.5 Kc band width.
> What is to be gained from r
Commercial, I'll give you, but truth is that most ham rigs are coming
out with deviations in the 6 kHz area. I don't 'buy' your statement that
they are designed for 5 kHz deviation. If they were, they would be so
adjusted when they are manufactured.
I take it that "I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS IS COMING
MY OTHER REPLY WAS AIMED AT THE PERSON RUNNING +-9kC DEVIATION.
73
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, mch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 'correct' maximum depends mostly on your neighbors when it comes to
> the ham band, but you should never run so much as to interfere with
> adjacent cha
Come on...someone please say it...Most all radios built for FM use on
commertial and or amature bands are designed for a MAXIMUM of +-5Kc
deviation, period! Most receivers are built for +-7.5 Kc band width.
What is to be gained from running higher than design deviation? What
you gain is a Radio t
13 matches
Mail list logo