--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hl31943 wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if this helps, but the UHF manual says to replace
Q203
> > with L217, which couples the output of Q202 to the antenna
switch. I
> > haven't found a value for L217 yet. This should gi
hl31943 wrote:
>
> I don't know if this helps, but the UHF manual says to replace Q203
> with L217, which couples the output of Q202 to the antenna switch. I
> haven't found a value for L217 yet. This should give you a 2 to 5 W
> output.
> Howard
> WB4GUD
Thanks for the additional tidbit, How
At 3/6/2006 09:47 AM, you wrote:
>It sure makes a difference when things are designed for low power.
>My whole daniels rig, receivers and transmitters for 2M and 440, draws
>about 80mA at idle. I have a mobile radio that I use for a control
>link, which draws about 300mA at idle.
>
>In the daniel
It sure makes a difference when things are designed for low power.
My whole daniels rig, receivers and transmitters for 2M and 440, draws
about 80mA at idle. I have a mobile radio that I use for a control
link, which draws about 300mA at idle.
In the daniels, there's a lot of attention paid t
watts so pumping 25-40W out
isn't necessary.
- Rob
>
> From: "Steve Bosshard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/03/05 Sun PM 03:21:13 EST
> To:
> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Low Power GE Phoenix...
>
> Seems like in the old days, when
Seems like in the old days, when the Phoenix was new, that the synthesizer
and microprocessor consumed a bunch of current and that from a low power /
solar power, etc stand point, a crystal controlled radio was more
conservative of power - maybe a crystal talkie or the like would be more
practical.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I've got a friend who is looking to drop a couple of GE Phoenix
radios
> down to 2-5W for a low power/low current draw application. I
*assume*
> that the final amp transistor can be strapped but is there any
> addit
7 matches
Mail list logo
