Much appreciated !! I'll pass the info on (though I think the guy is monitoring
the list now hi hi !!)
- Original Message -
From: Nate Duehr
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Scanner as rep
Sorry, replying to myself...
Another website about the USB dongles...
http://app-rpt.qrvc.com/usbsoundfob.html
Nate WY0X
I also see the Asterisk app_rpt folks have documented on their website
that someone is building turn-key Asterisk setups for radio linking:
http://www.xelatec.com/xippr/
I know nothing about them.
Nate WY0X
John Barrett wrote:
> Someone tell me that echolink can be configured for LAN only, or that astersk
> can be setup for start on boot without using a special radio interface board,
> and we'll move forward along those lines :)
Asterisk doesn't require a special radio interface board.
There are
I'm just middle-manning this one -- astrisk was rejected by the guy setting up
the repeater due to complexity and hardware required -- echolink due to
requiring a true connection to the internet -- this has got to work completely
within the private network already in existance between the sites,
John Barrett wrote:
> Is there anything out there a little more integrated that can handle the
> job, or other suggestions as to a solution ?? Prefered environment is
> Windows, with some hope that a "service app" that will run at boot can
> be found. 2 way solutions like Echolink and Asterisk
Have you looked at SvxLink?
This is not Windows, but Linux. The installation is not complicated, and
with SvxLink you only need a PC, no external hardware.
At our repeater we use two or three RX linked in via internet. On the
reciver sites the only needed hardware is the RX itself and a PC. The PC
-
From: Nate Duehr
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Scanner as repeater receiver?
JOHN MACKEY wrote:
> Skipp-
> Everything you say below is correct. But I would still argue that it simply
JOHN MACKEY wrote:
> Skipp-
> Everything you say below is correct. But I would still argue that it simply
> isn't worth it to do all the modifications you suggest to a scanner when you
> can pick up a good receiver from a Motrac/Micor/MastrII/MastrPro for $25 at a
> hamfest or ebay and have a rece
involved -
Thanks for the indulgence -
NØATH / Dave
- Original Message -
From: skipp025
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 6:15 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Scanner as repeater receiver?
I posted the following reply to the group on Aug. 13th
and it do
> "Chuck Kelsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another point is what service is the intended repeater to
> be used in? Ham? OK, play around and learn.
That's kind of what this group is all about... fun and
excitement.
> If it's for the fire service where public safety
> is concerned, leave th
Very true John, but the question was asked about if it could
be done. Yes it can and I have done it... with mixed results
depending on the specific scanner I used. Many of the better
late model crystal scanners used the popular Motorola MC-3357
and MC-3359 chips, which are the same as the back
Another point is what service is the intended repeater to be used in? Ham?
OK, play around and learn. If it's for the fire service where public safety
is concerned, leave the repeaters to the pros.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message - > Everything you say below is correct. But I
would s
etter than the modified
scanner.
-- Original Message --
Received: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:15:47 PM PDT
From: "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Scanner as repeater receiver?
> I posted the following reply to the g
I posted the following reply to the group on Aug. 13th
and it doesn't appear on the group (although Jeff received
my email direct). Here it is again to the group...
Re: Re: Scanner as repeater receiver?
Hi Jeff,
There are some conditions where a scanner receiver could be
modified for use in r
All it would be is made over crap. He should go get a cheap Micor or
Master II for a receiver.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> jstechnicalservice wrote:
> > Has anyone used a good quality scanner as a receiver for a
repeater and
> > if so, how w
A sensitive receiver is usually a terrible repeater receiver.
Scanners do not have good filtering and adjacent channel rejection.
Don't do it!
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "jstechnicalservice"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anyone used a good quality scanner as a receiver for a r
17 matches
Mail list logo
